Of course it happens in Super Rugby; mistakes and errors happen in all sports. However, many Top 14 matches seem to be such a grind. Maybe I'm just not getting to see the good ones, as we do not get all of the matches. This last round we only got USAP v Toulon, and last week we only got Clermont v Castres and Bayonne v Paris. As for your remark about muddy pitches, well that is probably true. When Super Rugby started back in the 1990's, SANZAR set a minimum standard for quality of pitches, and every franchise was given about five years upgrade their standards. Just about every pitch used by NZ Elite teams has been totally relaid, with new drainage systems and a sand base resulting in no muddy pitches any more, not even in the depths of the wettest winter. The last two weeks have seen very high rainfall in NZ, yet you wouldn't know it watching the Chiefs v Crusaders and Hurricanes v Blues matches. I cant remember the last time I saw a Super Rugby match played in the mud. Many of the pitches used for elite rugby in France (and elsewhere) appear to be sub-standard. Perhaps if some of the Top 14 clubs invested some of their money in upgrading their pitches instead of buying players, the situation might improve.
So much this. New Zealand is not a tropical island but we never have muddy pitches here any more. Wellington has 48 inches of rain a year whereas London receives only 23, Manchester 33, Newcastle 26, Paris 25, Toulouse 25, Dublin 28, Edinburgh 28 and Cardiff 43. Westpac Stadium is used for 40+ events a year, often twice in the same weekend and has never had any problems with the turf. It amazes me the situation at the Millennium Stadium and in Paris. Never of those two places should continue to be allowed to hold international rugby union games with such poor quality pitches. If that is the quality of international pitches then I would hate to see what club grounds are like.