Swinson, Brake, Davey, Cable & Lamb are the only real choices we'll have to see who runs.They're presumably the only 2 candidates - and both approximately 5 times better options than Farron was.
Swinson, Brake, Davey, Cable & Lamb are the only real choices we'll have to see who runs.They're presumably the only 2 candidates - and both approximately 5 times better options than Farron was.
TBF they do keep adding letters when I was at college it changed from LGB to LGBT then it was LGBT+ now they've added another letter I can't ever remember which is what the + was supposed to stop happening....
Well if I were selectingNever said anyone was a sell out but that is what is widely alleged.
I think Cable would do a far better job as Brexit secretary than DDavies. Also think he would appeal to the public more than you might think. People are starting to see through politicians who talk BS and appreciate straight talkers who say it as it is.
Well if I were selecting a Brexit secretary from Liberal Democrats I'd pick one the few trade negotiators we actually have in this country who's dealt with both China and Russia....
He was on the EU's side on that negotiation...."surprisingly"What part of Europe are they from again?
Lol ;-)
Yes I was saying who should be not who will be.He's a dead turkey with the street cred of road kill.
He's tainted by the coalition with the conservatives.
As mean as it sounds his actual biggest issue is the fact he's 74. Most are shocked he bothered running for his seat again.My experience of talking to people of various political views is that Cable has the most support across the whole spectrum with Conservative, Labour and Lib Dem voters all believing he is reasonably trustworthy. Whether he could be a good party leader is debatable but his habit for straight talking without his straight talk being complete ******** is quite appealing.
Judging people by their gender is still sexism, whichever gender it is; and doing so really doesn't help calls for equalityShe wrote: "Feminist that I am, I have of course wondered what a bloke in my position would do. It's obvious.
"Most blokes in my shoes would run for leader like a shot.
"It's true that my many years of encouraging women to have the confidence to go for that exciting new role have taught me that women often don't go for things when they should."
But she added: "Just because a man would do it, doesn't make it the right thing to do."
Jo Swinson has rued herself out; surey leaving the door open for Vince Cable if he wants it: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-40321277
Swinson has, however, gone down in my estimation with her "reverse sexism"
Judging people by their gender is still sexism, whichever gender it is; and doing so really doesn't help calls for equality
Yup, she seems to be missing that no-one considers it an obligation; she may be seen as a future leader, and a good choice for now, but quite honestly, she's a better choice for 12 years time. She's 37 and relatively inexperienced, this will not be the last leadership challenge available to her. She appears to be a talented politician and a decent person, but there's absolutely no rush; and there is no shame at all in saying that she isn't ready for, or simply doesn't want, the level of responsibility that goes with being a party leader. No need to bring sexism into it at all.Sounds like she is making excuses for why she doesn't want to run for leadership and obviously thinks playing the feminist card is the way to go.
I mean she does know that plenty of male politicians have ruled themselves out of being a party leader before and will continue to do so.