I do find the spin on this election quite interesting...
People either seem to think that the Tories did really well, with the highest share of the popular vote in 60 years; whilst Labour "only" did Gordon Brown numbers, and failed badly as they're still a significant minority.
OR
People seem to think that the Tories failed badly, losing their majority; whilst Labour did really well, with the highest share of the popular vote in 60 years.
Even
@ncurd, sitting in the middle as a neutral in this falls into this, whilst also saying that "it was May, not Corbyn that lost this for the Tories"
In reality however, both Labour AND Tories increased their share of the popular vote (labour by more than Tories); whilst only one of those parties increased their seats in parliament (and we ARE stuck with a FPTP system after all); and Corbyn did as much well as May did badly. To heap all the credit/blame to one side is to completely ignore what happened during the campaign.
May alienated voters by lying, doing U-turns, dodging questions, and releasing a bad manifesto
Corbyn claimed voters by showing integrity, getting a fair hearing on his opinions, and appealing to people (young, old and in between) who actually care about policy (however valid criticisms of not costing the manifesto are).
Also lesson is Opinion polls are pile a rubbish. Only accurate one that was in the ball park was the Exit poll.
As with the last few votes, and "the opinion polls are rubbish" - they're not really, they're just interpretted really badly.
Opinion polls initially showed a strong conservative majority, which decreased week by week, to the point that most polls were within their margin of error for a hung parliament by the time people were actualy casting their votes.
Same in the USA - initially showing an easy victory, then really squeaky bum time by voting day
Same with Brexit - initially showing an easy victory, then really squeaky bum time by voting day