I'm more concerned about Musk's algorithm pushing it onto my feed. I went back through posts I interact with (like, I don't post) and it's 95% sport, humour and music and 5% north of Ireland politics. No history, no fascism etc... It seems malicious to me, especially coupled with the rubbish that Musk tweets himself.
Something similar happens/happened to me. It used to be on one side of the spectrum and now it is on the other. Actually, on both. Again pendulum.
The thing i find interesting is that a lot of the complains i hear/read about twitter these days (not you. I repeat, NOT you) happen to coincide with a specific side of the political spectrum that was clearly protected in the past on that platform. The nutjobs on the right used to be banned swiftly while the ones on the left roamed freely. Now both can do the latter so if you look at the "change", well, obviously the number of nutjobs from the right has increased and it shows. No argument there. The problem i see is that the ones complaining now didn't appear to have a problem with nutjobs as long as those came from the political side they happened to support. That leads me to believe they didnt care about nutjobs per se; they cared about politics. If that is the case then i do have a problem with that. Am i making myself clear? Congruence is important to me. If you only cry foul when one side does it that screams bias.
My memory is not that bad: I recall Antifa doxing law enforcement agents and Twitter doing nothing for quite a while under Dorsey (eventually they deleted the tweet if i recall correctly). A high profile radical feminist misgendered a trans activist and nothing happened, but when someone relatively famous from the centre to the right of the spectrum did the same and bam, all the alerts started ringing. Kathy griffin asking for people to post names the minors who used MAGA hats in that high school incident and twitter not considering that a breach of the TOS because, and i paraphrase twitters GC and head of legal: "our doxing policy is about posting private info, and we do not consider names to be private info". I remember when i listened to that because i repeated that fragment several times. Twitter suspended the ney york post's twitter account when they tweeted about Hunter Biden...
I get the frustration and share it, to a point. But i have eyes, ears and memory which forces me to ask, what did I expect? When a place is so left leaning any move to the centre or the right might look like an extreme right wing invasion.
And again, i agree with you that the nutjobs from the right are mental. Suggesting Hitler was the good guy and Churchill the bad guy should deserve a one way ticket to the betty ford centre in my book. Straight jacket material.
(i hope) we agree on that. But i do see the context (context is probably the wrong word, apologies). I've seen what i consider the same degree of madness from the other side and most said nothing. Again, not YOU, i am making a hasty generalization based on what I read/hear.
The phrase "learn to code" used to get you a temporary ban while (again) a high profile individual publicly asking for the names of
minors wearing MAGA hats was not considered fair game. It was not somethign they missed. Twitter was alerted, repeatedly, they reviewed the tweets in question, analyzed them, judged them and concluded they were fair game. And these are just the ones i recall.
That is, imo, just as mental.
Is the algorithm ****? Agreed. Is it targeted? Probably but i am happy to concede. Was this expected? Yes, absolutely.