It's also misleading because Joe Bloggs typically doesn't get SCAT5 / PCSS tested, so just have a nuance-less blanket recommendation.
Rugby professionals, on the other hand, see a neurologist pretty-much every day of their return to play protocols.
Barry O'Driscoll thinks rugby's protocols aren't stringent enough - TBH, I agree with him; but think the bigger problem is still that they're not applied properly.
However, rugby's concussion protocols are in line with the best practice guidelines from the neurology community as a whole.
It's like the lawsuit case; I (and Dr O'Driscoll) may think that the rugby authorities acted too slowly and too shallowly when the lng-term risks of concussion became better known. But it's tough to hold a sports administrator to account for that when they're asking and following guidelines written by the experts in the field.