Havilli had a poor Super Rugby season though, or rather he looked pretty pedestrian on attack this year.also how good is Havili here? what an offload, he's better than Jordie imo
Havilli had a poor Super Rugby season though, or rather he looked pretty pedestrian on attack this year.also how good is Havili here? what an offload, he's better than Jordie imo
Havilli had a poor Super Rugby season though, or rather he looked pretty pedestrian on attack this year.
As someone who obsessively plays fantasy rugby I can tell you he wasn't doing much in terms of clean breaks/meters run/defenders beaten, especially in comparison to other outside backs. Just for what it's worth, I know he did a fine job at game management, tactical kicking and so forth. Also he's still really young and one bad season doesn't mean he's ruined, but I understand why he's out of the conversation this year.he wasnt that bad, better than jordie still, another super rugby win
Two things I am curious about that i'm hoping you can answer...Pretty much zero surprises for the Springbok team... Koch in for Louw is the closest and I'm sure they are just resting him. DDA back, Flouw in for Notshe, otherwise pretty standard.
Nothing left but to enjoy the game!
i like the humour, but give aphiwe some credit there. no-one else could've prevented that situation form being a try.He also decided the game last time in Wellington where we won by 2 points, match winning knock-on
here's the vid as a reminder to some folk what we'll be missing!
also how good is Havili here? what an offload, he's better than Jordie imo
ill be watching Goodhue closely, really hoping he is our long term answer for centre, he certainly looks like it i nthe early days, but we thought the same of ALB 2 years ago and he's faded some what (particuarly defensively) and hasn't pushed on.
gotta rate Marx, very good player, he'd be up there in the conversation for the best hooker in world rugby currently, taylors impressed in coles absence tho
fingers crossed richie comes off the bench and puts in a game winning performance, really rate the guy, had a tough debut but i back him to come right, he's defo got the quality to be one of the best 10's in world rugby
Agree about ngatai. He never should've left. An ABs jersey was just waiting for him to recover from his concussion symptoms. Crotty and ngatai would've been devastating with sbw or alb off the bench.firstly, charlie ngatai is our best midfielder, it was stupid to let him go.
I don't think Flouw is our best 8, or even an 8 at all, it's really a bit of a weakness with us at the moment, the only player who I would consider good enough and not out of position is Vermulen who is unavailable at the moment. I like Whiteley but he offers nothing but work rate and a little carrying in wide channels, so our balance between fetching/carrying/grunt can feel a little off with him on the field. I assume Flouw is there to give us more clout in the breakdown.Two things I am curious about that i'm hoping you can answer...
1.Do you think Flouw is your best 8 available? He doesn't seem like an 8 to me, but i guess with flouw there kolisi is freed up for more of a running role? and i guess that's not too different thaw its been working with whitely or vermeulen. i might have just answered my own question?
2.In the reserves, why damian in addition to elton? I don't know a lot about willemse, except he's played 10 at super rugby, he's young, but he's big and athletic. I don't know how much experience he's had in midfield or outside backs, but he's only young, so not much? it seems like two tens in the reserves, so please enlighten me.
a. What is the intended backline at 80 minute in terms of personnel and positions?
b. for injuries, what are the various contingency plans?
pollard injured. bring in elton to 10? or ?
de allende injured. pollard moves to 12 with elton at 10? or is damian willemse seen as a 12 option? or?
kriel injured. pollard moves to 12 with elton at 10, de allende moves out to 13? or pollard moves to 13 elton in at 10? or?
a winger injured. willemse to wing? or kriel to wing, willemse to 13? or?
fullback injured. willemse to fullback? or?
I don't think Flouw is our best 8, or even an 8 at all, it's really a bit of a weakness with us at the moment, the only player who I would consider good enough and not out of position is Vermulen who is unavailable at the moment. I like Whiteley but he offers nothing but work rate and a little carrying in wide channels, so our balance between fetching/carrying/grunt can feel a little off with him on the field. I assume Flouw is there to give us more clout in the breakdown.
Willemse is covering 15 off the bench, but in his short career he has played a number of positions including 12 and wing, it's a little weird he's on the bench with Jantjies but I think Rassie see's him as an important player for the future and just wants him to have time in the side regardless of whether he is playing in the right positions.
As for injury and positional contingencies, you have to remember that Rassie took over this year, and our back line never really clicked or had a stable formula before that, meaning we barely know our starting combinations let alone who their back ups are. Willie/Faf/Pollard/Dyantyi have probably all played themselves into a starting position but we've been so desperate for a little consistency I don't think we have much of a plan beyond that.
edit: Note to self, don't make posts first thing in the morning, I apologies to anyone who read the first draft of this, for assaulting you with that incoherent mess.
We should struggle and I guess that places an onus on the Boks to make it a tight game. Tight games is good for both teams and whilst this game isn't for any trophy, there's plenty on the line here for both teams moving forward. We want the revenge. The Boks want their fans to truly believe in them again....i think we are going to struggle a bit, and the end result will be really close
One for both teams. Yep definitely.Two cheap shots in a row there.