- Joined
- Jul 4, 2011
- Messages
- 11,725
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
Exactly. What is happening is pretty obvious to anyone who looks into the issue, but unfortunately there are still a number of people out there that are willfully ignorant.
Are you just trolling? Otherwise wow. Just wow.
As has been explained time and time again, these players are New Zealanders. The vast majority were born in New Zealand (Peleseuma is the sole exception I can find). Grew up in New Zealand. All played for New Zealand Secondary Schools. All were involved in the NZ Under 20 training camps. The fact NZ has a policy of only selected players in the their final year of eligibility means these players have the opportunity to turn out for there country of ethnic origin while they are 19, before being selected for the New Zealand side in their final year of eligibility (which was always going to happen regardless of whether they turned out for Tonga/Fiji/Samoa the year before). How you interpret this as being 'cherry picked' is truly bizarre.
Where did you get that from? I simply stated the Māori are Pacific Islanders. As are Tongans. As are Cook Islanders. As are Uveans. Pacific Islanders simply refers to people from the Pacific Islands.
Great to see you know how to copy and paste: http://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/publications/pasifika_education/27772/2
I am quite aware of what the term 'Pacific Islander' means. Are you? As the text you have quoted states, each Pacific Society has its own historical, political and cultural uniqueness. Māori are not Tongans. Tongans are not Fijians. Niueans are not Samoans. They are all Pacific Islanders though.
Spot on. If the rules were changed so that U20 caps tied players to particular nations these sort of players would almost certainly not turn out for Tonga/Fiji/Samoa. This would certainly weaken these sides not only at U20 level, but also at test level, as it would greatly reduce their potential player pool in future.
Thanks must spread rep around before giving it to TRF_Darwin again.