Great signing for Bath, if true. Him and Biggs will be a great partnership, Nd will mean Banahan will be centre or nothing.
Cockerill will be kicking himself if he does go there and really performs.
You think Banahan wouldn't start?
I know he is rather rubbish, but he has a bigger reputation and is an international so I would be surprised if he didn't start for Bath.
In fairness, I think Cockerill would have liked to keep him. The amount of time active Rugby Championship players will be missing during the season for effectively put a kibosh on it though, and I'm slightly surprised Bath have taken up that same problem.
The Argentine players will be unavailable just as much as other international players though, and Leicester seem happy to keep Castro and Cole
The Argentines will miss September, and be back for the second round of the Heineken Cup, and the rest of October and then unavailable for November (half of which are LV Cup matches missed) and then that's it
they'll be there for the business end of the season, and miss just over two months of the British season, which is the same as any other international player playing in November and the Six Nations, so I think there's been more fuss made about it because it's a change, and coaches have previously got a good deal out of signing Argentines and them only missing November
I think tigers could easily have coped, if they really wanted to/tried. I know Cockers did want to keep hold, but they've got the cash and the depth to cover until he was back if they wanted.
exactly, Leicester have an All Black (Scott Hamilton) in reserve, he's better than most teams reserve winger/full back, and also Matt Smith can cover, and I wonder whether Mathew Tait has any chance of recovering or whether he's headed to a sad injury enforced early retirement
Leicester could have kept him (and indeed have retained Ayerza)