• Help Support The Rugby Forum :

The Ukraine War thread

HUGE difference between advocating for money spent versus people being sent into violent conflict as far as willingness to risk personal safety/comfort. Also do you think that the UK would support mass mobilization or is that something that would be political suicide for any politician that suggested it?
Not in principle it isn't no, you are the one making a strawman argument here. Are you saying that nobody is allowed to have an opinion on the use of military force unless they are in the military? Do your civics come from starship troopers?
 
Not in principle it isn't no, you are the one making a strawman argument here. Are you saying that nobody is allowed to have an opinion on the use of military force unless they are in the military? Do your civics come from starship troopers?
No my point is that it is easy for people to call for war when they are not at risk. Of course, you and everyone else are allowed an opinion, not to say I will agree with it though
 
No my point is that it is easy for people to call for war when they are not at risk. Of course, you and everyone else are allowed an opinion, not to say I will agree with it though
Yes but whether I personally do or don't go has zero reflection on whether the point I'm making is valid or not. It's a strawman and attempted ad hominem, you're going after me personally and not my argument.
 
What are you talking about? I wasn't saying anything about you individually only the people who beat the drum without knowing anything about the personal cost. Regardless of your area of service I respect that and your perspective about going in harm's way.
I'm talking about a draft dodging ****** with an orange face along with a draft dodging ****** from South Africa with a laminated face who are currently destroying the American vet community in such a vindictive way that Putin would blush.

Veterans don't forget and they are not to be under estimated. You think tango man can screw over the men and woman that Bush sent to war without push back?

Yeah best of luck with that
 
Not to protect Putin, but just to respond you in general:
Generals and Colonels are also not on the front line usually,but that doesn't mean they don't take part in a war
But Generals and colonels have spent time as young officers who have deployed
 

In all seriousness after WW1 the British army made a thing about Staff officers having to serve in units which wasn't a requirement before. In WW2 all the famous generals and some (the best) who fly under the radar all served in the trenches.
 
Haven't seen it yet. Nor heard about it. Interesting to see how it will be in reality, especially with some of my male colleagues... doubt that it will be mandatory though
Found an article https://www.gazetaprawna.pl/wiadomo...ejdzie-szkolenie-wojskowe-tusk-trwaja-pr.html

Where they quoted Tusk who compared Ukrainian army with 800k active and Russian with 1.3mln active and said that Poland should have at least 500k (with reservists)+ make an intense training for those who are not in the Army
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Top