• Help Support The Rugby Forum :

The best full back

<div class='quotemain'> I said it that way mostly because i'm undecided on who was the most dangerous fullback. [/b]

And you are undecided between Cully, Monty and Burke? Holgee Molgeez!! I can really see Burke and Montgomery penetrating defences and scoring tries on a regular basis
[/b][/quote]
A fullback doesn't have to be able to entertainingly weave through half the team to be considered dangerous. Monty and Burke's point tally shows this.
 
now that you put that way, i somewhat concur lol.. Cully's try scoring tally also shows he is the mantis!
 
<div class='quotemain'>
<div class='quotemain'> I said it that way mostly because i'm undecided on who was the most dangerous fullback. [/b]

And you are undecided between Cully, Monty and Burke? Holgee Molgeez!! I can really see Burke and Montgomery penetrating defences and scoring tries on a regular basis
[/b][/quote]
A fullback doesn't have to be able to entertainingly weave through half the team to be considered dangerous. Monty and Burke's point tally shows this. [/b][/quote]

What does goal kicking have to do with how dangerous a fullback is with the ball in hand?
 
Yeah what Ripper said? It's about penetration. Everything's about penetration.
 
Why are you guys so convinced there's only one way to play fullback effectively? You're so fixed on your own opinions, you're not even playing attention to what i'm saying.
 
Because last time I checked that goal kicking isn't part of the full backs job description.

I'd personally take one of, if not the most lethal counter attacker over an average to above average full back who can kick goals, which is all Percy is.
 
Because last time I checked that goal kicking isn't part of the full backs job description.

I'd personally take one of, if not the most lethal counter attacker over an average to above average full back who can kick goals, which is all Percy is. [/b]



very true, but being a top goal kicker is always a bonus. It takes pressure from the Fly half. I imagine England would have had a very different 4 years had they had a goal kicking fullback to take pressure of their fly-halves like Hodgeson.



I do agree though that the full back should be judged on their abilities in play (offensively and defensively) before goal kicking is really considered.
 
Nope, Monty is the best. He is a good runner and can kick at goal. Latham is very attacking but his tactical kicking is not like monty's kicking.
 
a fullback's defensive and attacking play is more demanded in the reseme than goal kicking. i also don't get why montgomery is the best fullback in so many peoples eyes, yes monty's a goodish fullback because his got good tactical kicking, but i think his defense is crap when 1 on 1, and i dont think he offers too much on attack, his goal kicking is only bonus and dosn't have much to do with the fact his a fullback, also just because he helped kick a team to wc victory dosn't mean his the best in his position. overratted in my opinion. There are better full backs in muliaina, latham, robinson, hernandez who are great on attack and got good allround games.
 
Nope, Monty is the best. He is a good runner and can kick at goal. Latham is very attacking but his tactical kicking is not like monty's kicking.
[/b]

lol, Monty is so ridiculously over rated. He's been crap his whole career up until 2 years ago when he started to kick more goals now he's suddenly the best. I remember a time when Boks fans were slitting their wrists whenever Percy was around. He's improved his defence a bit, kicks a bit better, but that's it, he's nothing special.
 
Yeah what Ripper said? It's about penetration. Everything's about penetration. [/b]
:lol2tn:



<div class='quotemain'>
Nope, Monty is the best. He is a good runner and can kick at goal. Latham is very attacking but his tactical kicking is not like monty's kicking.
[/b]

lol, Monty is so ridiculously over rated. He's been crap his whole career up until 2 years ago when he started to kick more goals now he's suddenly the best. I remember a time when Boks fans were slitting their wrists whenever Percy was around. He's improved his defence a bit, kicks a bit better, but that's it, he's nothing special. [/b][/quote] boseman, get over percy. he only kicks goals! so can the 1st 5 of most teams. how you can consider him great is shocking. apart from his goal kicking he doesn't hold a light to the likes of cullen and others of his calibre.
 
Basing on what I saw in World Cup and lately H-Cup, I think Nani Corleto is at the moment one of the best. Hernandez is excellent too but it's been a long time we do not see him at fullback, except one half against the Harlequins last sunday. Latham, for sure, is still a great fullback.

I saw Montgomery at some occasions since his debut in Perpignan and yes, I think is a little bit overrated. He's nothing special in attack, average at defense, and at the moment he's even not pretty acurate at goal kicking.

But I have to admit he did an excellent year 2007 and an almost perfect World Cup. (although he's very 'classic')
 

Latest posts

Top