S
Steve-o
Guest
I agree to disagree to what you're agreeing with
I disagree
The best fullback it's montgomery [/b]
<div class='quotemain'> I disagree
The best fullback it's montgomery [/b]
I guess it would depend on what your definition of what a fullback is, and what he should be doing on the field.doesn't mean he's the best, does it?
[/b]
I guess it would depend on what your definition of what a fullback is, and what he should be doing on the field.<div class='quotemain'>
doesn't mean he's the best, does it?
[/b]
hahamonty, for best looking full back. [/b]
I guess it would depend on what your definition of what a fullback is, and what he should be doing on the field.<div class='quotemain'> <div class='quotemain'>
doesn't mean he's the best, does it?
[/b]
I guess it would depend on what your definition of what a fullback is, and what he should be doing on the field.<div class='quotemain'>
<div class='quotemain'> <div class='quotemain'>
doesn't mean he's the best, does it?
[/b]
I said it that way mostly because i'm undecided on who was the most dangerous fullback. They all brought a different brand of rugby to the field, and they all had/have excellent careers. I would also suggest you be a bit more open minded to the different ways fullback can be played.
[/b]
<div class='quotemain'>
I said it that way mostly because i'm undecided on who was the most dangerous fullback. They all brought a different brand of rugby to the field, and they all had/have excellent careers. I would also suggest you be a bit more open minded to the different ways fullback can be played.
[/b]
<div class='quotemain'>
<div class='quotemain'>
I said it that way mostly because i'm undecided on who was the most dangerous fullback. They all brought a different brand of rugby to the field, and they all had/have excellent careers. I would also suggest you be a bit more open minded to the different ways fullback can be played.
[/b]
I said it that way mostly because i'm undecided on who was the most dangerous fullback. [/b]