• Help Support The Rugby Forum :

The best full back

Latham is a very hit and miss type of player for mine. Hes either absolutely phenomenal or absolutely dreadful. Matthew Burke in the mid to late 1990s was absolutely sensational. I agree that Hernandez is a magnificent fullback, as are the likes of Chris Paterson, Percy Montgomery and Mills Muliaina
 
Definetely Muliana for me, he's such a strong runner with ball in hand and as well as being elusive he is almost the complete package. Latham can be very good but he was poor against England so he only comes second. ;)
 
Can somebody please tell me exactly why P-Mont is so highly rated? What does "his suaveness" do so much better than anyone else? **** on attack, average on defence with a good kick. Latham, Robinson (although retired), Muliaina are all better.
 
Can somebody please tell me exactly why P-Mont is so highly rated? What does "his suaveness" do so much better than anyone else? **** on attack, average on defence with a good kick. Latham, Robinson (although retired), Muliaina are all better. [/b]

I have to agree with you on that one.
 
<div class='quotemain'> Can somebody please tell me exactly why P-Mont is so highly rated? What does "his suaveness" do so much better than anyone else? **** on attack, average on defence with a good kick. Latham, Robinson (although retired), Muliaina are all better. [/b]

I have to agree with you on that one.
[/b][/quote]

I agree Latham Robinson and Muliana are all superior
 
<div class='quotemain'>
<div class='quotemain'> Can somebody please tell me exactly why P-Mont is so highly rated? What does "his suaveness" do so much better than anyone else? **** on attack, average on defence with a good kick. Latham, Robinson (although retired), Muliaina are all better. [/b]

I have to agree with you on that one.
[/b][/quote]

I agree Latham Robinson and Muliana are all superior
[/b][/quote]
I have to disagree with you on that one
 
<div class='quotemain'>
<div class='quotemain'>
<div class='quotemain'> Can somebody please tell me exactly why P-Mont is so highly rated? What does "his suaveness" do so much better than anyone else? **** on attack, average on defence with a good kick. Latham, Robinson (although retired), Muliaina are all better. [/b]

I have to agree with you on that one.
[/b][/quote]

I agree Latham Robinson and Muliana are all superior
[/b][/quote]
I have to disagree with you on that one
[/b][/quote]

Set you differences aside its christmas.. :D
 
<div class='quotemain'>
<div class='quotemain'>
<div class='quotemain'>
<div class='quotemain'> Can somebody please tell me exactly why P-Mont is so highly rated? What does "his suaveness" do so much better than anyone else? **** on attack, average on defence with a good kick. Latham, Robinson (although retired), Muliaina are all better. [/b]

I have to agree with you on that one.
[/b][/quote]

I agree Latham Robinson and Muliana are all superior
[/b][/quote]
I have to disagree with you on that one
[/b][/quote]

Set you differences aside its christmas.. :D
[/b][/quote]



I disagree
 
<div class='quotemain'> <div class='quotemain'>
<div class='quotemain'>
<div class='quotemain'>
<div class='quotemain'> Can somebody please tell me exactly why P-Mont is so highly rated? What does "his suaveness" do so much better than anyone else? **** on attack, average on defence with a good kick. Latham, Robinson (although retired), Muliaina are all better. [/b]

I have to agree with you on that one.
[/b][/quote]

I agree Latham Robinson and Muliana are all superior
[/b][/quote]
I have to disagree with you on that one
[/b][/quote]

Set you differences aside its christmas.. :D
[/b][/quote]



I disagree
[/b][/quote]

I whole heartedly agree with you darkman
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Top