• Help Support The Rugby Forum :

Super Rugby: Cheetahs vs. Kings in Bloemfontein (27/04/2013)

Darwin

AKA Dingo_Darwin
Joined
May 30, 2007
Messages
6,154
Country Flag
New Zealand
Club or Nation
Highlanders
Super%20Rugby.png

Free State Stadium, Bloemfontein
Cheetahs.png
Versus%20Super.png
Kings.png
 
Cheetahs:

15 Hennie Daniller, 14 Willie le Roux, 13 Johann Sadie, 12 Robert Ebersohn, 11 Raymond Rhule, 10 Burton Francis, 9 Piet van Zyl, 8 Phillip van der Walt, 7 Lappies Labuschagne, 6 Heinrich Brussow, 5 Francois Uys, 4 Lood de Jager, 3 Lourens Adriaanse, 2 Adriaan Strauss (captain), 1 Coenie Oosthuizen
Substitutes: 16 Ryno Barnes, 17 Trevor Nyakane, 18 Rynhard Landman, 19 Frans Viljoen, 20 Sarel Pretorius, 21 Francois Brummer, 22 Ryno Benjamin
Kings:
15 George Whitehead, 14 Siyanda Grey, 13 Ronnie Cooke, 12 Andries Strauss (captain), 11 Michael Killian, 10 Demetri Catrakilis, 9 Shaun Venter, 8 Jacques Engelbrecht, 7 Wimpie van der Walt, 6 Cornell du Preez, 5 Rynier Bernardo, 4 Steven Sykes, 3 Kevin Buys, 2 Bandise Maku, 1 Schalk Ferreira

Substitutes: 16 Virgile Lacombe, 17 Grant Kemp, 18 David Bulbring, 19 Luke Watson, 20 Nicolas Vergallo, 21 Waylon Murray, 22 Siviwe Soyizwapi
 
sorry cyclone, we will never agree man...
Cheetahs by 21 :)
 
Kings are vulnerable where the Cheetah's are strong on attack. Out wide.
 
I prefer the look of the new backline, with Andries Strauss at inside and Waylon Murray at outside it was clogging up our midfield somewhat, at least with Cooke and Grey arranged as they are we aren't completely without flair, and should be faster to cover wide ball.

I don't feel like Cheetahs have necessarily been good out wide at all (that's the bulls) they are more the type of team to get over the advantage line with clever inside balls or chip kicks, in Australia we managed to play the territorial game purely because none of the teams we played had a Morne Steyn, but do the Cheetahs?

I'm sure the Cheetahs will win, probably by about 10, but I don't think they have the right skill set to smash us as thoroughly as the Bulls did.
 
SomeOke said:
I don't feel like Cheetahs have necessarily been good out wide at all (that's the bulls) they are more the type of team to get over the advantage line with clever inside balls or chip kicks, in Australia we managed to play the territorial game purely because none of the teams we played had a Morne Steyn, but do the Cheetahs?

I'm sure the Cheetahs will win, probably by about 10, but I don't think they have the right skill set to smash us as thoroughly as the Bulls did.

The king are strongest with watson on the bench and Engelbrecht on, he really makes a big difference, but it takes two to cover Lappies, so I don't know if he would get sucked in. And the cheetahs are capable of a good aerial battle with their new flyhalf, Burton, and their FB, Daniller, put some huge boots downfield against the bulls.
 
The king are strongest with watson on the bench and Engelbrecht on, he really makes a big difference, but it takes two to cover Lappies, so I don't know if he would get sucked in. And the cheetahs are capable of a good aerial battle with their new flyhalf, Burton, and their FB, Daniller, put some huge boots downfield against the bulls.
Is this football? The bigger they are the harder they fall commitment and heart all you need just ask James O' Connor
vlcsnap-2013-04-25-12h57m06s241_zps3c9be4b3.png


Loftus = High Altitude = Massive punts
 
Is this football? The bigger they are the harder they fall commitment and heart all you need just ask James O' Connor
vlcsnap-2013-04-25-12h57m06s241_zps3c9be4b3.png


Loftus = High Altitude = Massive punts

Try punctuation next time. It really is there for a reason.

After reading your post 7 times I still don't know what you meant to say. Except for the Loftus altitude bit.
 
Very happy for the Cheetahs, pity they missed out of the bonus point.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Top