- Joined
- Apr 27, 2008
- Messages
- 100,020,374
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
There shouldn't really be a debate, tbhThat's the umaga Smith debate put to bed surely?
Smith and Simmonds are much better (and Smith is a year younger)
There shouldn't really be a debate, tbhThat's the umaga Smith debate put to bed surely?
Hands on his hand. Word of the law that's not a red surely
At this moment in time - yes, but I don't think that's the question. The question is about who's got the higher ceiling of the 3.There shouldn't really be a debate, tbh
Smith and Simmonds are much better (and Smith is a year younger)
I absolutely agree that should be the case but as far as I am aware it's not.Straight red, no questions asked.
The actions of the tackled player do not absolve the tackler from their illegality.
Is there a match they're the right choice for?Dayglo and Ugo were the wrong choices for Wasps vs Quins
The way the decision is made in these situations though is they account for if a player puts their arm out to prevent their head hitting the floor. If it's deemed their head or neck would have hit the floor without them defending themselves then it is deemed a red. Been that way for a while.I absolutely agree that should be the case but as far as I am aware it's not.
He didn't land on his neck or shoulder. He would have, but he didn't.
Ok so just noticed this...seems very odd
Weird.
11-15 is four centres and a fullback (with the fullback on the wing)
Agreed, he can only bennefit from being with England. He does seem a very intelligent rugby player. Runs good lines and seen him attempt and pull off intercepts in the past as well as the fundamentals as you said.Dombrandts got to get a game (at least) at 8 for England this autumn
He's always been great on highlights but his fundamentals as an 8 are fantastic too
They make em soft in Leicester