Would playing less games, with none on international dates, mean better averages I wonder. Sometimes less is more, just because:-Average so far excluding the Twickenham fixtures.
Tigers : 21,784
Wasps: 17,858 (16,400 without the Tigers at the Ricoh fixture)
Bath: 14,439 -pretty clear a bigger ground is needed.
Quins: 14,142
Gloucs: 13,671
Saints: 13,547
Chiefs: 11,371
Saffacens: 8,207
Worcester: 7,846
Falcons: 7,570
Irish: 7,404
Sale: 5,642
1) more chance of seeing international players, I have been to 3 Big Games SAR v Har, and never seen full complement of internationals playing.
2) fixtures become more of a special event, rather than a constant.
If clubs plays LESS games, they would be able to have smaller squads, which would mean a greater spread of talent to maybe 14-16 teams.
The games would become more important as less time to 'catch up' over a season
Crowds would see top players rather than them being rested.
It is interesting to see that British sports, think that more games mean more money, which is not true.