- Joined
- Sep 18, 2015
- Messages
- 7,652
- Country Flag
Sharron Davies and JK Rowling have both stuck their heads above the parapet on this. By now they should be well prepared for the abuse that will inevitably come their way.
Not really difficult. Both fighters failed testosterone tests but were still allowed to fight. It's dangerous and shouldn't be allowed to happen. You have men beating up women in an olympic event.
Yeah, we need to separate out the "transgender in sport" discussion from the "chromosomes don't match physicality" discussion.Playing devil's advocate here: You're then stopping athletes identified as women at birth, raised women and who haven't doped from competing.
Obviously certain conditions and disabilities restrict people from competing all the time and there's a sizeable element of danger here. Not a simple issue though.
It's an absolute mess. Even with running there's an advatage i think.Yeah, we need to separate out the "transgender in sport" discussion from the "chromosomes don't match physicality" discussion.
The following will all be IMO and largely uninformed.
Transgender in elite sport should depend on how far someone has transitioned, and should at least include taking the correct dose of hormone therapy (which, to my understanding, will utterly knacker anyone's capacity to compete in elite sport).
For the latter, there simply is no good answer, and relies on being "fair" to both the competitor, and their competition. TBH, I'm mostly good with letting them compete, on the principal that people with those conditions will have been competing for as long as there's been an olympics movement, it's just that no-one knew. Which sucks for the rest of the field. I have changed my mind on this a few times over the last decade+. I will also allow that there's a difference between a sport where people are trying to run fast, and a sport where people are trying to batter their opponents into submission / concussion.
The only people who are actively wrong about such cases are those claiming that "it's not difficult"
Ok but in terms of boxing you have to be strict. It's not like the South African runner. In combat sports it could lead to serious long term damage that is why the testosterone tests are there. They both failed those but we're still allowed to complete. Many high profile female fighters like Clarissa Shields have spoken out against it. Will it stop certain athletes from competing? Yes but that's better than seeing a female boxer get her head caved in live on the BBC.Playing devil's advocate here: You're then stopping athletes identified as women at birth, raised women and who haven't doped from competing.
Obviously certain conditions and disabilities restrict people from competing all the time and there's a sizeable element of danger here. Not a simple issue though.
To be honest I think the difficulty is having blanket rules. Where's the fairness of not qualifying a boxer but not a runner even though the advantages are the same?Ok but in terms of boxing you have to be strict. It's not like the South African runner. In combat sports it could lead to serious long term damage that is why the testosterone tests are there. They both failed those but we're still allowed to complete. Many high profile female fighters like Clarissa Shields have spoken out against it. Will it stop certain athletes from competing? Yes but that's better than seeing a female boxer get her head caved in live on the BBC.
Yeah, we need to separate out the "transgender in sport" discussion from the "chromosomes don't match physicality" discussion.
The following will all be IMO and largely uninformed.
Transgender in elite sport should depend on how far someone has transitioned, and should at least include taking the correct dose of hormone therapy (which, to my understanding, will utterly knacker anyone's capacity to compete in elite sport).
For the latter, there simply is no good answer, and relies on being "fair" to both the competitor, and their competition. TBH, I'm mostly good with letting them compete, on the principal that people with those conditions will have been competing for as long as there's been an olympics movement, it's just that no-one knew. Which sucks for the rest of the field. I have changed my mind on this a few times over the last decade+. I will also allow that there's a difference between a sport where people are trying to run fast, and a sport where people are trying to batter their opponents into submission / concussion.
The only people who are actively wrong about such cases are those claiming that "it's not difficult"
From what i've read she was born with female genitalia and XY chromosomes. There lies the issue regarding how to classify her in terms of competitive sports categories (not as a person, please, dont go there).Does anyone have any background on Imane Khelif?
I tend to have a view on most hypothetical situations but this one is particularly tricky. Can't believe i am saying this but I wouldn't like to be the one calling the shots either. Lose-lose-lose.Difficult situation that I'd hate to be making the decisions on.
Well, that depends on your definition of man, doesn't it? That is precisely the point. What the rules of the competition allow doesn't reconcile well with what the general population thinks/believes should be allowed.You have men beating up women in an olympic event.
Bingo!Yeah, we need to separate out the "transgender in sport" discussion from the "chromosomes don't match physicality" discussion.
Agreed, at least in principle. The problem is you also need to be practical. Those standards, need to be applied universally. Can you realistically expect every 13 year old amateur athlete to be tested? Dont think about the UK, France, Ireland or US. Think of places like Algeria, Vietnam, Salvador, Belarus.Ok but in terms of boxing you have to be strict. It's not like the South African runner. In combat sports it could lead to serious long term damage that is why the testosterone tests are there.
TERFs being TERFs big surprise. Both are increidbly misinformed and are not interested in the kind of nuanced discussion that has been had here.Sharron Davies and JK Rowling have both stuck their heads above the parapet on this. By now they should be well prepared for the abuse that will inevitably come their way.
I used to train with Sharon many moons ago as early teens. She was very opinionated then and sometimes quite "forceful". Since daddy was the head coach she got away with a lot.Chromosome are a mess intersex people exist and there is no such thing as a binary.
TERFs being TERFs big surprise. Both are increidbly misinformed and are not interested in the kind of nuanced discussion that has been had here.
As an aside I don't know why Davies is employed by the BBC she makes Sonya look great at the rugby. Her interview with Peaty where she completely misinterpreted what he clearly said and then after he clarified continued to put word in his mouth was shocking. She also said something else to another competitor this morning that Foster almost had speak out loud was wrong.
Ok but it's the Olympics. Tests were taken , the results were a failure but the boxers were allowed to fight. Had they not have been allowed to fight I doubt anyone would know any different but now you have social media in a meltdown about supposed trans athletes (they are not trans but that doesn't seem to matter) fighting woman and female boxers being denied a chance of a medal after 4 years of hard work and dedication.Agreed, at least in principle. The problem is you also need to be practical. Those standards, need to be applied universally. Can you realistically expect every 13 year old amateur athlete to be tested? Dont think about the UK, France, Ireland or US. Think of places like Algeria, Vietnam, Salvador, Belarus.
It's not an easy problem to tackle.
Hold on there! That's taking it a bit farAs an aside I don't know why Davies is employed by the BBC she makes Sonya look great at the rugby.