Just a few thoughts...
Yesterday England had great problem between the two midfield, after an anonymous Hape showed (IMO) he's not an international, and Banahan not even a centre.
Ok, surely they didn't have the best "clients" in front of them: D'Arcy finally played at his best (especially in defence), and well...
"How to play outside centre" could be BOD's game abstract (Banahan, take notes!)!
But anyway, after watching Autumn Internationals and 2011 now Six Nations, I feel that Mike Tindall is not the solution to the midfield problem.
Against SH sides, he looked a bit out of pace, and even if England won against Australia 4 months ago, I'm not sure they can repeat it without being outplayed by the opponents midfields: they could find themselves short of pace and skill, like Traille, Jauzion and Rougerie found themselves in that nightmare in November, against a young, talented, rocket-legged backline, who jokingly ran around them!
And I think that Tindall didn't shine in this Six Nations, it seems he shone just due to his good performance against the worst Italian side seen in these last 4 years!
He did nothing special against France, Rougerie played better than him, Canale (I'm not a big fan of him) and Hook did it the same day in Rome...
Tindall could be a good leader, in a team who's playing without his designed (and true) leader - Moody. He could fix for a while some depth problems, but...
...I don't think England could afford to go to the RWC without a smart and skilled 12 and a well-paced 13!
Maybe I will belied, but that's what I've seen in the last 5 months...