Why why why would England go for that.
I thought I made that clear with:
The T14 are getting nearly £80 million a year. PRL will be doing well to get £30 million a year. Maybe they can compete in the future, but after ~4 years of that kind of TV deal disparity, I wouldn't be too fanciful of their chances.
You can definitely argue that either way though.
why would the Welsh,Scottish or Italians go for an extended Pro 12 which is all it is when its hardly worked for them to date.
Welsh - How many grand slams did the Welsh win when the game was professional and there was no Pro12/Magners League? How many have they won since the league started? So the WRU would be happy with the result of the Pro12. According to some on here, a league involving the Welsh regions and English clubs would be the saving of the Welsh regions.
Scottish - So, what professional Scottish league do you see being formed as an alternative? While Scotland hasn't been doing great since rugby went professional - they'd be doing a helluva lot worse without 2 professional teams in Scotland.
Italians - Their national team has steadily improved in 6N performances with their Pro12 entries helping to build a national squad strong enough to compete, rather than having a few big stars in France backed up by semi-pros.
Pride needs swallowing but only with the people who thought regional/franchise rugby could work in a club based NH.
:mellow:
There are only 2 countries in the world with a club based professional system.
Accepting international rugby as the zenith of the game; in the last 10 years, the supposedly inferior region based system has won 4 grand slams (2005, 2008, 2009, 2012). The supposedly superior club based system has won 2 (2004, 2010).
The Celtic league started in 2001. Since then, there has been 4 grand slams for teams from countries with the regional system and 4 for those with the club systems. There have been 7 wins for the club system and 5 wins for the regional system (regionals winning 42%).
In the decade prior to the Celtic league - all the grand slams were English or French (5 of them). There were 8 6/5N wins for England/France and 2 6/5N wins for the Scotland/Wales (Ireland being crap) (regionals winning 20%).
By what measure or means can you possibly justify that going to a regional system has not improved the fortunes of those countries who have used it? Or do you want me to start measuring success in the Heineken cup?
Smaller player wages, tight domestic leagues is the best way forward for most.
I'm not even going to dignify that "suggestion" with an answer.