- Joined
- Nov 2, 2006
- Messages
- 6,178
- Country Flag
A fair enough assessment. The only thing Croft did that Lydiate wouldn't - and probably the only reason he was on as long as he was - was take lots of lineout ball. And I would ask what would Lydiate have done that Croft didn't that we were missing? Croft put in a solid defensive performances and hit lots of rucks, which is what we'd have expected from Lydiate. Might have he done it better? Possible, but not nailed on. He might have done better with Croft's chance to give the overlap mind, he probably wouldn't have taken it on too long. But might not.
If Croft was on the team simply to add pace, then he should have been taken off the team the moment he developed that toe issue. But he was there to be a safe lineout option, to support the ball carrier, defend in midfield - and add pace when opportunities presented itself. He performed in 3 of the 4 things. I think this is where we disagree dull. Lydiate to start with Croft to come on? Not unless Croft is fit, and if Croft is fit, why not start him? Not to mention the lineout, which I think is key here. Youngs is completing his throws ok,but that's because they're all to the front. They're worrying about it, and as such, Croft is probably going to start. Right? Dunno, but as long as he accomplishes that and does his share of work in the tight - I think he's done what he's meant to. The wide carrying is gravy.
I also agree with jcahill1 that the forwards struggled to get traction going forwards, and that O'Brien might be the answer. Although, really, I'd be more than tempted to find out if Faletau can play 6 if that's what we're looking for.
Yeah, I wasn't necessarily suggesting Lydiate definitely start, more getting people's opinions on it. You make a very good point about Croft in the lineout, although I'd prefer if we could be a little more confident and move Croft to the middle or tail of the lineout and get some more attacking ball. Not his fault though. I do question whether Croft is required for that role though. POC is an excellent front-middle lineout jumper, and I'd expect him to do just as well in that regard. Alun-Wyn Jones another who jumps well. The understanding between Youngs and Croft from their time at Leicester could be what's most important though. Edit. Ignore the amount of "though's" in that paragraph, reads horribly upon re-reading, but can't be bothered to tidy it up.
Regarding the incident with the poor pass, I doubt Lydiate would have been in that position to give a pass at all. So whilst I'm slightly critical of Croft for that, most other players have butchered opportunities to a worse extent than that, or simply wouldn't be in position to take the pass.
Whilst I know I sounded very critical of Croft in that post, it wasn't necessarily my intention. Overall I think we have better options to do the tight-work, so whilst Croft was fairly good in that regard today, playing Lydiate, or even moving Warburton across would be just as good, if not better.
I'd possibly start him again next week if he's fully fit. I'm not sure about moving Faletau across. I think he could do the business, but is it worth moving someone out of position when we have excellent options there anyway, be that Croft, Lydiate, SOB or moving Warburton across to accommodate Tipuric?
Last edited: