D
dullonien
Guest
But is that Roberts' fault or the Blues and Wales? As soon as the Blues forwards started fronting up and giving the backs decent ball (Harlequins), Roberts suddenly had a great game. The fact of the matter is, Roberts > Bishop. Bishop is playing well, but I still don't think he offers much more than defense, and considering Roberts is in no way poor defensively, I can't see too much point playing Bishop ahead of Roberts. However if Roberts or Hook is moved to fullback, Bishop's the man to come in.
I remember the game between the Blues and Bath where Roberts was playing fullback. It was a dire night, ******* it down with rain. Roberts made an awesome break from his own 22 into Bath's 22, resulting in the match winning try. That's what always reminds me that Roberts has more to offer than simple brute strength. He showed a couple of good sidesteps and some good pace that day (and on others), so I think there's more to come from the lad.
I remember the game between the Blues and Bath where Roberts was playing fullback. It was a dire night, ******* it down with rain. Roberts made an awesome break from his own 22 into Bath's 22, resulting in the match winning try. That's what always reminds me that Roberts has more to offer than simple brute strength. He showed a couple of good sidesteps and some good pace that day (and on others), so I think there's more to come from the lad.