No he hasn't he has been average as said.
What games have your scrum dominated the opposition with Corbs in it?
God even the dreaded Steven Jones in the ST today says Corbs has been underwhelming since his return but will be selected as he is class! i.e. on hope rather than form!!!!
It's not like Kvesic is doing better at the breakdown because Robshaw is more tied up making tackles.Kvesic and Robshaw would be the closest thing we've had to Neil Back and Richard Hill forever and, while that's a good thing, it should also be noted their greatness was in part formed of a very hard carrying tight five. I do not think our attempt to do such a thing would be good enough. I think we'd have more success with the sort of tight five that frees up the back row to do a lot of carrying, but that seems to go hand in glove with putting a lot of pressure on our hooker.
In any case - I don't expect Kvesic to be given an opportunity to play like an openside. He's a good enough all round flanker to deserve a shot but I remain convinced Robshaw is better at the breakdown than he is allowed to show in that team because contesting the breakdown comes second to making tackles for them.
And, well, I like Robshaw a lot but I don't think he is categorically shown himself to be the flanker we need to reach the next level. Ideally, his position would not be safe.
No he hasn't he has been average as said.
What games have your scrum dominated the opposition with Corbs in it?
It's not like Kvesic is doing better at the breakdown because Robshaw is more tied up making tackles.
Think Steffon Armitage is going to get picked by Lancaster for the World Cup.
I suppose it depends on whether he's going to screw the system in pursuit of the RWC. I would.
Both of them no!Armitage yes! Abendanon no!!!
Both of them no!
They knew their lot when they went abroad.
I think you missed my point too. If Robshaw is being picked because "breakdown comes second to making tackles", then even by that standard, Kvesic may be a better choice. Kvesic's work rate on the floor doesn't detract from his tackling work rate. He's prolific in both because the guy has a freakish work rate in defence.You've completely missed my point. I'm talking about England's defensive system which puts very little priority on the jackal and therefore means players are rarely in the right place to execute. How anyone plays in their club system is somewhat immaterial to what they will do in England's system.
Some people don't realise that having Armitage in didn't mean we will win the World Cup.
I think you missed my point too. If Robshaw is being picked because "breakdown comes second to making tackles", then even by that standard, Kvesic may be a better choice. Kvesic's work rate on the floor doesn't detract from his tackling work rate...
That being said, I don't agree with you when it comes to fetching with England. Cole and Launchbury have both been credited with their breakdown work in the past. If they can prove their worth in that respect, then the handiest breakdown operator currently in England would probably get a bit of praise for it too.