Even Trescothick had a poor season by his standards.To be fair none of the players in contention for that spot have had a good season. There hasn't been one standout English batsman this summer.
Even Trescothick had a poor season by his standards.To be fair none of the players in contention for that spot have had a good season. There hasn't been one standout English batsman this summer.
Tresco is in his 40's and was a hand eye player without a great technique so you would be exspecting his output to be declining.Even Trescothick had a poor season by his standards.
Warner's an air head always has been.So De Kock and Warner...
Warner's an air head always has been.
How about Taylor's 181* on one leg?!? One of the best knocks I've ever seen!
One of the best short format innings I've seen in a long time.How about Taylor's 181* on one leg?!? One of the best knocks I've ever seen!
Hopefully they do lol, Davey Dumb Dumb (that's what he's known as in NZ) could do with a bit of his own medicine...I won't be surprised at all if the fans at the stadium jump on the band wagon and make his life even worse on the field...
Absolutely! If only we had him today... our order is beyond inconsistent atm and Kane isn't carrying us like he used to. England are a dynamite one day side. Looking forward to the tests!One of the best short format innings I've seen in a long time.
Bancroft was the guy tasked with the actual cheating. Smith as a good captain has to do came out to defend his player and said it was a plan by the leadership group. That indicates that Warner might have been involved. It might have been Warner who came up with the idea, organized who is going to do it and then Smith would obviously have needed to give permission for this along with Warner. So how is it that Smith is the one being attacked solely, he lost his captaincy, got suspended for the rest of the series. But Warner and Bancroft escapes serious punishment with just their match fees reduced.
I think you are missing that Smith was part of the "leadership group" that decided to do this. Bancroft is just the fall guy for being one of the rookies in the squad. Bancroft, Smith, Warner and Lyon was in the Match Referee's office.
But look at the media conference Smith gave. It was such a half-hearted admission. And now there's evidence coming out of previous indiscretions. One of the tv pundits also said, that they will look at the Durban test's tapes and see if they could pick something up, as it's nearly impossible to get the ball to reverse swing before 30 overs...
No i got that he was part of the leadership group and yes as the captain who would allow this action to be done on the field he has to take some of the flack.
I just wondered that Smith obviously would not come out in the press conference and say something like "it was Warners plan" rather he attributed it do the leadership group. Now i dont know much about Smiths character but im guessing that if he came up with that idea alone then he would've said so in his press conference. My issue is that i think Smith is being made the fall guy based on his leadership position even though the inquiry is yet to determine who was the real mastermind behind it. It baffels me that the guy who actually tampered with the ball despite his "young" age of 25 and despite of him not being part of the leadership group got off much lighter than his captain.
I think a lot of it has to do with the (surreal) attitude the Australian Cricket team has come out with over the last several years as 'holier than thou', complaining about fans getting personal (which always makes me laugh), and 'personal sledging'.No i got that he was part of the leadership group and yes as the captain who would allow this action to be done on the field he has to take some of the flack.
I just wondered that Smith obviously would not come out in the press conference and say something like "it was Warners plan" rather he attributed it do the leadership group. Now i dont know much about Smiths character but im guessing that if he came up with that idea alone then he would've said so in his press conference. My issue is that i think Smith is being made the fall guy based on his leadership position even though the inquiry is yet to determine who was the real mastermind behind it. It baffels me that the guy who actually tampered with the ball despite his "young" age of 25 and despite of him not being part of the leadership group got off much lighter than his captain.
I think a lot of it has to do with the (surreal) attitude the Australian Cricket team has come out with over the last several years as 'holier than thou', complaining about fans getting personal (which always makes me laugh), and 'personal sledging'.
The tears over the last days in interviews for 'getting caught cheating' (NB. Not 'cheating', but 'getting caught cheating' are not going to receive any sympathy from any nation that actually plays cricket, apart from the perps (I guess it's in the genes ))
And with that our world cup chances went out of the window. With him we had an outside chance, without him i can't see that happening.AB de Villiers retired yesterday from all international cricket at the ripe age of 34.
I'm gutted!