Toulouse's priority obviously isn't the xv de France, who in the world believes or says that.
The priority is to win trophies for the club. Who says that? well thousands of Toulouse fans like me. I'd love you to walk into a meeting of the fans association and tell to their face their club's priority in which they invest their time and money should change to.. les Bleus. What a laugh!!!
But you're, as usual, avoiding to say more relevant things with these coverups. In stead of telling me what Toulouse's priorities aren't, rather tell me that they will indeed need to supply the xv de France with players - nobody will question that either.
not true. This is being questioned by many here incl. the club president. Read his interview, Noves and the coaching staff. They're not exactly "nobodies".
Tell me how you feel towards Toulouse, as it always has, supplying players in the future to the xv de France, because like I said you're very rhetorical with your posts and we're not quite sure what you're saying but we're getting glimpses. Are you saying Toulouse should STOP SUPPLYING FRANCE WITH PLAYERS because they've got a full season to be competitive in and are paying for the players etc etc ..? Yes or no. If yes, in what conditions then ? In a way that violates the latest FFR-LNR agreement ? We're back to stage -3. France play burned out players and 1/4 the time other sides get to practice together.
I never said the club should stop supplying internationals. Bouscatel has never said that. He said and argued very convincingly how the current deal is detrimental to the club and threatens its presence in the elite because it impacts on our competitiveness. We haven't won a major trophies for too long. So he is correct.
If he feels the club's presence in the elite is compromised by the heavy price Toulouse pay to the national side, he has the right to speak up and as president take measure to protect the club. Nothing strange or wrong about that.
Toulouse do not need to supply internationals to remain who they are. I'm 18 years involved in this club and I've no problem saying that. We do it because we can, not because we must. There's no written rule out there that says we must. It's been a tradition. But traditions can and will change. We're dealing with a fast changing world here. And rugby is not some imovable object. Also, it's not a necessity for the club in order to exist in sporting terms, and we don't need it financially.
as things stand it's no longer viable for the club to chase both Bouclier & H Cup AND provide the bulk of internationals. We have done it successfully in the past. Not any more. I want my club to stay at the top. And if that means reducing the involvement of our internationals with les Bleus, then so be it. FFR can get their international meat somewhere else. There's another 13 clubs to choose from.
The thing is the club is recruiting more foreigners. Some of the French players recruited this year are Has-been like Harinordoquy who won't get selected (the club is recruiting too many old players in my view). Only 3 youngsters from the Academy have been signed a pro contract for next season. So the pool of available French internationals at the club isn't going to be that great in years to come compared to what we had in the past. It is what it is my friend.
And about money, oh I do get it actually, I know the clubs got compensated, some article stated how much exactly per borrowed player some months ago, but obviously it's not enough - not enough MONEY that is - to really compensate for the loss of Picamoles, Dusautoir, Nyanga, Huget and co. for Toulouse. A club in the Top 14 is facing fierce competition every weekend and struggles to keep alive no matter how loaded the roster, and then there's the H Cup.
Money is not the issue here. The compensation was increased last season. Has the rift gone away? no it hasn't.
It's just a little interesting we always end up talking about the same thing but never come to some consensus agreement.
never said we have to agree. I've told you before I don't expect you to agree with me - we can agree to disagree
I don't even think there's a debate about what's wrong if you're unbiased and look at it neutrally,
who says I have to look at it as a neutral?! I'm a toulousain.
Both France and clubs have to coexist, and so far it's the clubs that are taking the upperhand.
yes and they will hold on to it as long as they can.
.