Where do you buy your trampolines that you use to jump to such ridiculous conclusions?
You seem to think the world is some massive conspiracy to only criticise the right wing, but that's just simply not the case.
Even then: I say you're crazy for suggesting only the EDL bunch are getting arrested, and you come out and start calling me a bigot.
Please tell me where I said the left wingers who break the law deserve to get away scot free?
Please tell me where I say we should excuse all wrongful behaviour from the left.
Please tell me where you buy your tin foil for your hats.
Just google "anti-fa arrested" before making such inflammatory, and wrong, statements.
Please tell me why an odious and cretinous berk like you is still breathing oxygen.
1) Where DIDN'T you say that 'I agree that the law should apply for both sides of the extremist divide - that both elements are wrong and need calling out and punishing to the full extent of the law?'
2) Where DIDN'T you say that 'wrongful behaviour from the left is wrong and as bad as the wrongful behaviour of the right?'
3) By choosing not to answer what was said and instead making a pratish comment about tin foil, you excused the wrongful behaviour of the left.
4) There are no tin hats here, precious. If you think that wanting a world without violence, intimidation, threats etc. and both sides of extremism ruining the wonderful society which our ancestors worked so hard to provide for makes me mad then I suggest you take a good look in the mirror and re-evaluate your existence.
I do not think the world is anything of the sort, but I do believe in the balance of fairness and that if you are going to prosecute (for example) a white person for saying 'death to blacks and gays', then you should also prosecute a black person for saying 'death to whites'. Equally, both sentences need to be of the same length and one doubts whether any sentences handed down to Antifa will be of the same magnitude as they will be to the more right-wing elements.
How about googling how The Guardian is calling the violent actions of Antifa 'dissent' and asking whether dissent is a crime? They conveniently ignore the fact that people had to be hospitalised and some have life-changing injuries as a result of their violence. Yes, I would say the same were it right-wing people attacking the left; I loathe violence and believe that there is no place for it in a civilised society, but some people obviously believe in exceptions.
The Guardian, and the left in general, will never accept that they are in any way to blame for their actions.
Facts are irrelevant in the face of a good shouty argument
