• Help Support The Rugby Forum :

A Political Thread pt. 2

XL bully ban a 'huge burden' on policing, chiefs say

Sums up why the place is broke.

The NPCC lead for dangerous dogs, Chief Constable Mark Hobrough, said kennelling costs and veterinary bills in England and Wales had risen from £4m in 2018 to more than £11m between February and September 2024 - during the first eight months of the ban.

He added that by April this year, forces predict they could have spent £25m, a rise of 500%.
Click to expand...

The dogs are gonna be destroyed. After getting them out of public sight, shooting them in the head will not cost £25m.
Yet the thought of doing that will be considered morally questionable as it involves a bit of blood and and no sterile environment (as if that matters given the f**king thing is gonna be killed anyway).

The nation as a whole needs to harden the f**k up and really start to question where they're p|ssing away money.

A bullet in the head of serial offenders would do no harm either, but that's another debate.
 
Amiga500 said:
XL bully ban a 'huge burden' on policing, chiefs say

Sums up why the place is broke.



The dogs are gonna be destroyed. After getting them out of public sight, shooting them in the head will not cost £25m.
Yet the thought of doing that will be considered morally questionable as it involves a bit of blood and and no sterile environment (as if that matters given the f**king thing is gonna be killed anyway).

The nation as a whole needs to harden the f**k up and really start to question where they're p|ssing away money.

A bullet in the head of serial offenders would do no harm either, but that's another debate.
Click to expand...
Not sure shooting dogs is a priority as a financial saving measure.

As for the death penalty no thanks.
 
Amiga500 said:
XL bully ban a 'huge burden' on policing, chiefs say

Sums up why the place is broke.



The dogs are gonna be destroyed. After getting them out of public sight, shooting them in the head will not cost £25m.
Yet the thought of doing that will be considered morally questionable as it involves a bit of blood and and no sterile environment (as if that matters given the f**king thing is gonna be killed anyway).

The nation as a whole needs to harden the f**k up and really start to question where they're p|ssing away money.

A bullet in the head of serial offenders would do no harm either, but that's another debate.
Click to expand...
Are you going all MAGA on us?
 
ncurd said:
TBF he's been appointed ambassador to one of biggest trade partners, etc.

He can't really go slagging him off. Which sucks but is diplomacy.
Click to expand...
He did slag him off that ship's sailed and tbh he was right. He should have stuck to his guns. Or i wonder if someone who is making ill judged and wrong comments to the press really suitable as a diplomat.

Half the problem with Trump is everyone from Tech bros, media and politicians are rolling over and having there bellies tickled, Trump gives zero f@#£s who he upsets or offends. Everyone else is apologising for upsetting him because they are scared of what he'll do.

I just wish people had the courage and conviction to stand up to him.
 
The supreme court have him free rein to do what he wants. He cannot be held criminally liable any more as President so can simply ignore things like the jaw on what a president can and can't do.

It will be interesting if any agencies simply refuse to enact his illegal orders. I doubt it but you never know.

This is why I cannot understand the far right, they claim to be patriots yet are right at the front of undermining their own country every opportunity they have. It's not just in the USA they are doing this.
 
Saintjay said:
Not sure shooting dogs is a priority as a financial saving measure.

As for the death penalty no thanks.
Click to expand...

Easy savings.
No doubt reflected across the sphere of public services.


The death penalty for owning a dog was hardly meant to be taken seriously!
Albeit maybe not so much of a joke for repeat offenders who have a dog that ends up killing a kid. They probably do deserve one.
 
ncurd said:
I see Trump is already scraping at the bottom of the barrel on this. ******* sickening.
Click to expand...
I am very much opposed to any form of legislated DEI but I agree. There is no evidence of any lowering of standards being a part of this accident. We know nothing about the air traffic control crew on duty or the experience or training of the plane crew let alone the mechanical condition of both aircraft. Hegseth, the Sec of Defense has already said that the helicopter crew involved was experienced. Definitely a time for people to allow the powers that be to conduct an actual investigation before spouting off on causes of the accident. His comments are not helpful and very wrong at this juncture.
 
www.dailymail.co.uk

Trump briefs the press on the D.C. air tragedy

President Donald Trump briefed reporters Thursday hours a passenger plane collided with a military Blackhawk just off DC's Ronald Reagan airport, after raising questions about how it happened.
www.dailymail.co.uk www.dailymail.co.uk

Utterly shameless b'stard

From the article:

"President Trump now oversees the military and the FAA. One of his first acts was to fire and suspend some of the key personnel who helped keep our skies safe."
 

Users who are viewing this thread

  • Total: 10 (members: 1, guests: 9)

    Latest posts

    Top