Think he covered it without much issue but insane question.What kind of question is this?
Why is a question asking if Stramer is a threat to the security of the country? Surely that's leading
Think he covered it without much issue but insane question.What kind of question is this?
Why is a question asking if Stramer is a threat to the security of the country? Surely that's leading
Definitely not pulling Sunak up on his and the Conservative's record.What kind of question is this?
Why is a question asking if Stramer is a threat to the security of the country? Surely that's leading
Sunak is a genuine football fan to be fair but Starmers a football nerd by all accounts.What kind of question is that to end on?
Starmer answered it like someone who watched football at least.
I feel Stamer ended better.
But fuk me that was a terrible debate.
Agreed polls have basically shown everyone's made their mind up its just trying to work out how many of the dont knows turn up and where that will be distributed.Don't think that debate will have changed much. Neither of them look like great leaders and that's shown by their personal ratings. Sunak's message of trust us won't resonate, but I don't think Starmer will have won over large amounts of undecided voters either.
As far as I'm aware neither Labour nor Conservatives have released it. Seems a bit silly to have the debate before this.Still to read Labour's manifesto. They've not release it yet?
Honestly I think most people made their minds up on the winner of the debate in the opening exchanges. I think the 2k per household cut through (although unsurprsingly it ********). Which is why were seeing a rough 51 to 49 Sunak as I felt after that exchange Starmer was much better.It looked to me like Sunak had a plan to face down Starmer - constantly look him in the eye and challenge him which perhaps wasn't surprising given how far behind he was in the polls. Starmer looked like he was in the last round of a boxing match already well ahead on points and just trying to get through to the final bell without taking any big risks.
I thought Starmer looked quite flustered at times tbh but the moderator was truly awful and contributed to that by letting Sunak speak too much including his constant interrupting and talking over Starmer who it looked like was expecting a more civilised debate. I would expect Starmer to be better in the next one and his team will surely have a word with the next moderator to make sure the same doesn't happen again. The problem is there are no consequences when one participant doesn't do as they're told and repeat offends which is why Sunak got away with it.
Honestly I think most people made their minds up on the winner of the debate in the opening exchanges. I think the 2k per household cut through (although unsurprsingly it ********). Which is why were seeing a rough 51 to 49 Sunak as I felt after that exchange Starmer was much better.
I think Starmer was right as the debate went on to just keep his mouth shut when Sunak spoke over him even when he was trying to answer. Made Sunak look stupid by not letting him answer.
Although I find it hilarious the rags are saying its a knockout by Sunak.
Yup I'm unsure how much fact checkers work but its good its falling apart and being reported as such by news broadcasters already.If I were Starmer I'd let the fact checkers do their work and call out Sunak on it at the next debate but stay calm and measured. Looks like the spotlight is already on the £2k tax claim made by Sunak. Good to hear Ashworth liken Sunak to BoJo this morning on the airwaves.