- Joined
- Jul 15, 2011
- Messages
- 8,356
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
Ouch!Royal Engineers so very likely.
Ouch!Royal Engineers so very likely.
Protests erupted in Kansas City, Missouri, over the weekend after a homeowner shot a black teenager twice who rang their doorbell by mistake.
Ralph Yarl, 16, was trying to pick up his brothers from a friend's house on 13 April, but went to the wrong address.
The suspect shot Mr Yarl through his door.
Police have released the shooter from custody but not identified them.
"In Missouri, a person taken into custody for a felony investigation must be released or charged within 24 hours."Ralph Yarl: Black teen shot at doorstep after ringing wrong doorbell
Ralph Yarl's parents sent him to pick up his brothers, but he arrived at the wrong address.www.bbc.co.uk
Aye sure, more guns make USA safer...
In missourah it's reasonable self defense to shoot a black person on your property or something."In Missouri, a person taken into custody for a felony investigation must be released or charged within 24 hours."
How the **** has he not been charged?
There's a suggestion the police are determining whether the shooter's action can come under 'stand your ground' law"In Missouri, a person taken into custody for a felony investigation must be released or charged within 24 hours."
How the **** has he not been charged?
Lol, just l o ******* l. If a jury wants to do that then not much you can do but the police/DA can't be that dense.There's a suggestion the police are determining whether the shooter's action can come under 'stand your ground' law
I'm pretty sure the "stand your ground" laws aren't so broad as to just let you shoot anyone you please from your home. There's got to be a reasonable belief of a threat. A black person ringing your doorbell simply shouldn't be deemed reasonable threat. If they deem it is, then those states are essentially at the level of lynching as it's making murdering black people legal (because let's face it, if he was white this would already be over and he'd have been charged).There's a suggestion the police are determining whether the shooter's action can come under 'stand your ground' law
Tony Martins problem was instead of calling the police straight after the shooting, he left the scene and went to his mum's. He then waited for the police to turn up to arrest him. Had he just called the police straight away, stayed at the farm and waited for them to arrive, in the words of his defence lawyer "no jury in the land would have convicted him"One of the reasons Tony Martin was at first found guilty i believe. The first shot wasn't necessarily the issue, the second shot "executing" the burglar in the garden was.
The USA is f*#ked. Crazy gun laws. Fear of black violence and gun crime fed by the right. I believe Kansas City has a really high murder rate, and black on black killings. A country of people living in fear because of what the powers that be created, where shoot first is a reasonable option.
I remember some SA posters here had no issue with shooting through a door if you think you've been broken into. This was when Oscar Pistorius was arrested. The argument being you don't live in a gated community with guards. Where people break into homes and kill the occupants on a semi-regular basis. British life doesn't have the fear of murder and gun crime like other countries.
Deluded. No. 1 priority?
I find that whole thing odd tbh. Yes it's wrong and needs to be investigated, but I don't doubt for second far, far more is going on in Westminster than this. PPE, donations etc.The irony of it coming from a member of that party though...
Yeah, but Westminister write the rules to keep the loop holes there. Remember their mantra, no rules were broken, even it was completely unethical.I find that whole thing odd tbh. Yes it's wrong and needs to be investigated, but I don't doubt for second far, far more is going on in Westminster than this. PPE, donations etc.