3? surely not even in our wildest dreams!Oh it's get funnier.
Labour and Tory being staunchly FPTP makes sense for themnow we know why starmer is so staunchly pro-fptp
Diffrent modelling and boundaries so the 3 was real according to one another said 4 another 2. Problem with polls like that yougov one is it destroys models because the variance between historical data and current is wide you can predict at all where that surge in support will actually materialise.3? surely not even in our wildest dreams!
ETA: This sounds more believable, and is still hillarious
Tewkesbury would still be blue
Very fair point - at some stage thought, the modeller has to step in and say "come on"Diffrent modelling and boundaries so the 3 was real according to one another said 4 another 2. Problem with polls like that yougov one is it destroys models because the variance between historical data and current is wide you can predict at all where that surge in support will actually materialise.
One of the more interesting bits of data was 50% of LD voters last time out said they'd vote Lab. I know I'm in that group but I switched shortly after the 2019 election.
Yeah, Labour still think they can win a majority so turkey's won't vote for Christmas. They're going to be emboldened by these latest polls as well but I'm not getting excited yet.now we know why starmer is so staunchly pro-fptp
The inferior Ukraine who have effectively defeated the Professional Russian army, caused Russia to mobilize 300k men, faught and gained parity with an air force 10 times it's number and made its Black sea fleet hide behind the Crimea!Poland's foreign minister has now said that if Russia uses even a tactical nuclear weapon in Ukraine, NATO should make it clear it will respond with a conventional strike mission, probably cruise missiles and air-launched weapons from outside Ukrainian territory aimed at specific Russian-held targets in Ukraine.
The idea seems to be not striking inarguable Russian soil and not using WMDs themselves but also launching a counterstrike on a large enough scale to deter further actions.
I'm comfortable with this idea, until....
Russian channels on Telegram are now (I'm told) suggesting that "losing" a confrontation against NATO is something they can accept but not against "inferior" Ukraine.
Which rather puckered my pucker
Further highlights of Liz's tour of local radio stations:
https://youtube.com/c/RoadHomeMotorcycleVlogsOn Ukraine - I know I keep posting maps of the Ukrainian advance; and have discussed targets and defensible points to halt and regroup etc - mostly by looking for things that google really doesn't want to show (rivers and railways) - so I've decided to "make" my own google map overlay showing those things. The issue is that to see these things on the maps, you have zoom so far in, you've lost track of what else is where.
I'm not going to make any attempt to keep track of the frontline, or contested areas etc; it's just something that can be seen in a separate tab, to make a little more sense of the tactical/logistical situation.
Oh, there are loads in terms of what's going on militarily, and I've got myself down to 3 mappers I follow who are both prompt, but actually fact checking things.https://youtube.com/c/RoadHomeMotorcycleVlogs
This guy does a running commentary on what is happening in Ukraine with maps