- Joined
- Sep 18, 2015
- Messages
- 7,532
- Country Flag
IFW and CCS --> Daly and Roots. A big step down, but not as bad as, e.g., if Cole had been injured, or Mitchell, or George.
So that's a 5 at 6 though he may sometimes be at 8, a 7 at 7 and 8, a 13 at 11, 12 and 13, a 6 at 19, an 8 at 20 and a 12 at 23. Got it.
I mean this team did very well last week and the only changes are injuries. Id have picked someone else at 23 tbh but i can live with Daly there and he has played alot of wing and is experienced. Much rather IFW and CCS over daly and roots ofcourse but cant be helped.So that's a 5 at 6 though he may sometimes be at 8, a 7 at 7 and 8, a 13 at 11, 12 and 13, a 6 at 19, an 8 at 20 and a 12 at 23. Got it.
You'd think after the success of picking a 14 at 14, even if it meant moving your other (mostly) 14 to 11, Borthwick might have picked the next best pacy runner of good lines available to him at 14 and kept the continuity. Instead, it seems you can never have too many 13s.
I am so disappointed with this side. I really thought learning might have taken place.
I could even accept Tuilagi at 12, having seen the acres of open space in the 10 channel for France v Wales. Instead, we'll be treated to Daly against Penaud. Daly seems to have played 11 twice at club level in the last 2 years.
Not sure. Think it's horses for courses. Really depends on the opposition, weather and game plan.I don't think Steward will even be called up going forward for a bit. Going from being a core player to not making the 23 means I think he will be out completely unless he is needed to be involved in the 23 due to injuries.
Alternatively, Borthwick kept up with cardio work after his playing days, but doesn't have to do any lifting, scrummaging, mauling, or any of the other work that active players have to.If the Times is right in saying that Borthwick would beat Chessum on it while both were at Tigers then either Borthwick's Superman or it's an indication that what he was saying about players not being fit enough had some substance.
Yeah, how many matches does someone have to play in a "different" position before they can be considered "not out of position"?Yes players are out of position in a few cases but Earl has excelled as our 8
I mean this team did very well last week and the only changes are injuries. Id have picked someone else at 23 tbh but i can live with Daly there and he has played alot of wing and is experienced. Much rather IFW and CCS over daly and roots ofcourse but cant be helped.
Yes players are out of position in a few cases but Earl has excelled as our 8 and with Martin and Underhill it allows him to play his natural game. Chessum played well at 6 and deserves another shot. Lawrence is prob our best 12 which is annoying but honestly im not sold on Dingwall. Lawrence scored down the wing last week, Freeman and Furbank attack in the centre of the park aswell and look for work. So yes a few out of position but id say the team is balanced tbh so i dont really get the moaning.
My guess is that manu is there to run down Ramos' channel for the last 20 given he was weak in defence last week.
I think SB thinks IFW and Freeman are the future and Daly is that utility experience to fall back on, when they are settled i think he will be phases out tbh or hope so. I dont mind Daly being there tbh.I've got no quibbles over some of the changes of position (and it's better than picking Dafydd "definitely not a flanker, never played there" Jenkins as a flanker) but as I say, Daly has played winger at club level twice in two years according to all.rugby. It's insulting to think that Slip Backwards thinks he's the best available when he doesn't play there. I don't accept the 'experience' argument, we seemed to do OK with a guy making his first start on the wing last week... and I didn't think that Daly added anything at 13 last week either.
Daly at 13 or not in the XV. Excellent choice at 23. I think I've made my preferences clear
I'd definitely have started Smith too; he's a running threat at 10, as well as being the #YoungIceman.
Obviously, I agree about Manu (I did say so...) being there for a purpose, but, even though *he's not a crash ball merchant* Lawrence can still add more pace and power than Ramos can handle. This frees up 23 for Daly and means we can include an actual try-scoring winger.
It's the Lawes thing all over again, but at least we won't have to deal with everyone yelling about moving him to lock this timeAlternatively, Borthwick kept up with cardio work after his playing days, but doesn't have to do any lifting, scrummaging, mauling, or any of the other work that active players have to.
Yeah, how many matches does someone have to play in a "different" position before they can be considered "not out of position"?
Earl's started more than 30 matches at 8, and will have filled in there plenty more times. That's a full season's worth. He's also shown himself to be a very good international #8.
I don't think Steward will even be called up going forward for a bit. Going from being a core player to not making the 23 means I think he will be out completely unless he is needed to be involved in the 23 due to injuries.
"MOVE BEN EARL TO LOCK!"It's the Lawes thing all over again, but at least we won't have to deal with everyone yelling about moving him to lock this time
Dont forget Chessum actually packed down at 8 on defensive scrums v Ireland.I mean this team did very well last week and the only changes are injuries. Id have picked someone else at 23 tbh but i can live with Daly there and he has played alot of wing and is experienced. Much rather IFW and CCS over daly and roots ofcourse but cant be helped.
Yes players are out of position in a few cases but Earl has excelled as our 8 and with Martin and Underhill it allows him to play his natural game. Chessum played well at 6 and deserves another shot. Lawrence is prob our best 12 which is annoying but honestly im not sold on Dingwall. Lawrence scored down the wing last week, Freeman and Furbank attack in the centre of the park aswell and look for work. So yes a few out of position but id say the team is balanced tbh so i dont really get the moaning.
My guess is that manu is there to run down Ramos' channel for the last 20 given he was weak in defence last week.