- Joined
- Oct 4, 2015
- Messages
- 2,218
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
I thought the wallabies did a lot of the instigating.That was a poor game of rugby. Argentina were just cheap-shot merchants all game and the Wallabies were also petulant and retaliated. Very little good rugby was played. Very disappointing fayre. Both teams were gifted the chance to win a trophy and they've handed it to the All Blacks on a plate. I don't see the Pumas coming within 25 points of NZ next week. I think it will be a similar result to Bledisloe 3 in Sydney. The ABs will get a bonus point and put it out of reach.
I thought the wallabies did a lot of the instigating.
Taniela Tupou was probably lucky to avoid the sin-bin in the first half. He was involved in a lot of the incidents.I thought the wallabies did a lot of the instigating.
He reminds me of Sinkler a bit. He was so dominant but he was getting so arced up. Then he gets rightly pulled for losing his rag. He had their scrum on skates and was bending the line and making metres. Big hits in defence. Just needs to mature.Taniela Tupou was probably lucky to avoid the sin-bin in the first half. He was involved in a lot of the incidents.
When Tupou reacted to Sanchez and started the hug fest, if you watch it again you'll realize Sanchez kicked at the ball and kicked both his number 5 in the head and Tongan Thor in the eye.I thought the wallabies did a lot of the instigating.
And the Argentinians were lucky not to have players carded. They instigated most of the incidentsTaniela Tupou was probably lucky to avoid the sin-bin in the first half. He was involved in a lot of the incidents.
i think you may have agree to disagreeAnd the Argentinians were lucky not to have players carded. They instigated most of the incidents
I think if you view the game in isolation it might be difficult to tell exactly who incites all the incidents. But consider the broader patterns. The Argies are notorious windup merchants and the Wallabies notoriously easy to wind up.i think you may have agree to disagree
I think the aussie started lots of stuff, the argies over reacted a few times
Sanchez kicked Tupou in the head. I'd say he started that particular incident.i think you may have agree to disagree
I think the aussie started lots of stuff, the argies over reacted a few times
personally i see those as overly simplistic views of each caseSanchez kicked Tupou in the head. I'd say he started that particular incident.
Matera is captain. He should be above pulling someone's hair.
I didn't say it was one way. But I'm not buying into your story that the aussies started everything.personally i see those as overly simplistic views of each case
Sanchez was kicking at the ball and got tupou, Tupou is then the one that give him a shove/punch
and Matera was grabbing Paenga-Amosa to pull him out of a scuffle, he got just as much jersey as hair, in that split second i dont think there was a lot of though into what he was grabbing.
none of that is good stuff but hardly one way
Never said they started everything....I didn't say it was one way. But I'm not buying into your story that the aussies started everything.
personally i see those as overly simplistic views of each case
Sanchez was kicking at the ball and got tupou, Tupou is then the one that give him a shove/punch
and Matera was grabbing Paenga-Amosa to pull him out of a scuffle, he got just as much jersey as hair, in that split second i dont think there was a lot of though into what he was grabbing.
none of that is good stuff but hardly one way
@Woldog and that would be fair enough, just isn;t really a good example of the argies instigating ****le