[2017 RBS Six Nations] Round 2: Wales vs England (11/02/2017)

[Which Tyler]

It's like I've been transported back to the 90s - Welsh fans claiming the moral victory.
Who was it who said that you never beat the Welsh - just score more points than them?

 

[The5thOfficial]

I'm just glad that the kick was fielded by Ford, with Faz and Daly back with him. Had it been Brown in any of those positions then I fear he would have taken the ball into contact and lost the opportunity

Definitely! Brown has lost some mojo recently, in my eyes. Couple of years ago he came storming onto the scene.... now.... mmmmm I dunno!

- - - Updated - - -

It's like I've been transported back to the 90s - Welsh fans claiming the moral victory.
Who was it who said that you never beat the Welsh - just score more points than them?

Not sure which Welsh people you're directing your comment at? My comments would have been the same if Scotland and France game had ended the same way. No moral victory claimed, just commenting on the end of a great game. And I just happen to be Welsh, for which I duly apologise!

- - - Updated - - -

I don't think Youngs was offside. Jiffy yelled about it, but on the replay, and as BCM suggested, he looked fine.

Whatever! Swings and roundabouts!

 

[Mrs. Peter Quinn]

By the way, was the turnover leading to Davies' kick in any way legal?
Thought it was ok the first time I watched it but saw it again and Launchbury dives on the ball on the ground, then Liam Williams goes off his feet and on his knees manages to wrest the ball from Launchbury..

How is that legal and how has it not been commented on? So the implicit logic going on here is about how the kick was the only difference between winning and losing for Wales but England were in a very good position before the turnover....then Liam Williams commits what looks to be a professional foul which would be a yellow card and a penalty? Am I missing something?

 

[McTallshort]

No it was illegal but the end result was 7 points not 3 so happy days.

 

[Mrs. Peter Quinn]

No it was illegal but the end result was 7 points not 3 so happy days.

Indeed. I suppose my point is re. the idea that Wales were hard-done by or deserved to win or that only the kick prevented Wales winning. England had a good chance at a score if that ball isn't turned over illegally, so I don't think there's much justification to feel quite so robbed as it were

 

[McTallshort]

As we both know, if they deserved victory they would have won

 

[Mrs. Peter Quinn]

As we both know, if they deserved victory they would have won

Yeh, I'm just adding extra factors for the few (VC) resisting the idea that England were deserved winners, and also in general just speculating how no-one has even TALKED about that turnover.

 

[The Jones Boy]

Good teams play for 75 minutes, winning teams play for 80.

The All Blacks only play for about half an hour in an 80 minute stretch so there goes your theory.

 

[ALJ]

The All Blacks only play for about half an hour in an 80 minute stretch so there goes your theory.

I already know how you would justify this statement but it is a ridiculous thing to say.

I can only assume you're on the wind up.

 

[The Jones Boy]

Sorry mate, it's the truth.
The AB's only crank for a small portion of any major game. In that time they blitz their scoring.

 

[Bada-Bing!]

http://www.planetrugby.com/news/analysis-wales-try-scoring-struggle/

Good article from Sam Larner published on Planet Rugby site.

 

[McTallshort]

But they make the right decisions/execute the basics/ win their set piece/defend intensely etc for 80 minutes yes? Or do they just mince around for 60 minutes hoping to catch the opposition up in their 20 minute purple patch?

 

[Vieux Talonneur]

Sorry mate, it's the truth.
The AB's only crank for a small portion of any major game. In that time they blitz their scoring.

However you choose to phrase it, TJB is right. The ABs regularly kill games in 15 or 20 minute spells, far too often for it to be coincidence. That's what makes them so dangerous, Eng certainly need to learn the art of sealing games much earlier when the opportunities arise.

 

[Mrs. Peter Quinn]

The better you are the less time you need to play well for to get away with it. Therefore if you play well for 75 minutes and still lose, you're not good enough.

 

[pagliaccio_euforico]

That was exactly what I said, more or less.
But so would Youngs have been penalised - that's all 50/50 and refs decisions etc. Swings and roundabouts.
Ah that old cherry again. My point was they almost DID lose! Just that last 5 minutes!

Ffs youngs was not offsides, just cause a commentator yells about it for 10 minutes doesn't mean it actually happened.

- - - Updated - - -

Sorry mate, it's the truth.
The AB's only crank for a small portion of any major game. In that time they blitz their scoring.

Strategy is a big part of who the better team is though.

 

[DozeyPillock]

Ffs youngs was not offsides, just cause a commentator yells about it for 10 minutes doesn't mean it actually happened.

Don't know how to make the picture bigger, but this shows the starting position of Youngs as the ball comes out of the ruck to AWJ

 

[Ragey Erasmus]

Don't know how to make the picture bigger, but this shows the starting position of Youngs as the ball comes out of the ruck to AWJ

Looks onside to me.

 

[DozeyPillock]

Looks onside to me.

All day, every day. Ball is in the hands and off the deck (so out), and Youngs is behind the last foot, if you follow the line of the grass cuts. His line speed is what made Jiffy shout offside for 10 minutes.

 

[pagliaccio_euforico]

itoje only english player in the ruck, he may be tall but there is no way his feet extend back into where youngs is in front of them

 

[Goodey]

The better you are the less time you need to play well for to get away with it. Therefore if you play well for 75 minutes and still lose, you're not good enough.

^facts