- Joined
- Oct 30, 2014
- Messages
- 3,575
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
the England coaching team singled Defence out for JJ to improve.
I didn't realise that. I don't know when he was told that, but I stand by my opinion that today he is a very good defender.
I'm not sure it's worth comparing Burrell against JJ as they play different positions at club level, where LB is a pretty solid defender at 12 and has been pretty solid for England at 13 (I don't recall him getting minced at any point but feel free to correct me).
I can't recall specific examples, but for both Saints and England my impression is Burrell tends to go high, so sometimes falls off tackles and rarely puts in a dominant hit. JJ usually has at least one tackle a game which makes me go "good hit". I'm actually a big fan of Burrell (although I'm just catching up with the Sale game and literally as I typed that he knocked one on horribly under no pressure!) I just don't think his defence is all that. If I was England coach I actually think I'd play him at 12 with JJ outside.
On Eastmond, i think you have to look at where the system in NZ was failing. In short it's all very well saying it's only one game and he wasn't alone and so on but the point is NZ singled him out for specific treatment and that had a huge detrimental effect on the entire defence - that is a huge point to take into consideration.
Maybe, but the same New Zealand didn't single him out 4 months later at Twickenham, so if what you say is true then whatever his issue was has presumably been solved.