Ah, but he didn't mention Ford.
Yes, I agree that at international level a good bosh carrier seems a badly needed addition to that midfield, but that doesn't rule out a 2nd out-half style player if you have the right man available. And as Bath have shown, albeit at lower levels, there's other ways of balancing it.
My gut says Hask is ahead of Wood at the moment.
Haskell usurp's Wood in the pecking order.
Think both Slade and Burgess are in now.
Strong team out there, nearly full strength.
From an outsider perspective it would be better for the rest of the world if SL chose Wood. He is injury prone and brittle. He's tall and quick and a fine player but in the big games he is injury prone.
Haskell is the one the other teams do not want to face. He's a monster, an enforcer and with him at 6 you can play a genuine sniffer at number 7 who is lightning fast, if England has one, failing that play another blindside like Robshaw.
Do you actually watch rugby?
Wood is injury prone and Haskell is an enforcer?
Both not correct, Haskell often goes missing in bigger games and is certainly not an enforcer and wood is not that I jury proned at all compared to other rugby players.
Agreed. Speaking as someone who's a bit rugby thick, even my random ******** can help spark discussion. Welcome friend
On current form, I, and I think Lancaster, would take Haskell over Wood. When the Hask works he works well, when Wood works he works well- who's working atm?
What a team! All this talk about Burrell "is he going to perform"? I Can't see how he isn't going to perform in that team with those players around him against this french team, i think SL could pick me at 12 and i would probably look half decent..
Itoje ??
Can't believe they won't take Slade after the performance last game . I think he will get another look in during the Ireland game tbh
Lancaster actually said he doesn't NEED to cut the team on the 31st of August
Such TYPICAL English arrogance there Tobes!