He definitely does things wrong at the breakdown, ncurd. I read something on a New Zealand website today that mentioned he was the most penalized flanker in the world. People here must think we live in a bubble with McCaw but that's not always true. There are plenty of articles about how McCaw must atone for his dumb actions against Argentina, or about how he is getting ill disciplined. Above Robshaw or Hooper or Pocock. Some of that is getting caught out, because he has overstepped the mark (like any player does through a given indiscretion.) Some of that is because he's older now, and when he thrived he was younger and you never had to release the player in the tackle - I think his technique has worsened a little bit with age. But his work rate is phenomenal - and that is proven by the statistics. It seems like you're a reasonable guy, and so are a bunch of other posters are too, and I think we can agree that when the stats say he's made the most tackles, then it goes to show what we all suspected. The guy is a work horse. Don't think anyone disagrees there which is great.
My issue is the consistency of the cheater thing. McCaw isn't the ONLY player in World Rugby who is "good at getting away with it." Yet we only have discussions and threads on him. David Pocock has been better at it for a good while now. McCaw is still one of the best players in the world, but he hasn't been in that league of breakdown gurus for a long time. A few players around the globe have overtaken him in this aspect actually. My issue is, I've never seen a New Zealand article going on about how Pocock or insert whatever name you wish is a "cheat", but that's okay because he's good at it kinda thing. It's interesting that it's the first thing to spring to people's minds when they think about him. Why slander someone with that tag? They're a good player, there's absolutely no need to sully their entire playing reputation because on a few occasions they overstepped the mark and got away with it. There are also plenty of times that Pocock gets it spot on, and completely within the confines of the rules. Nothing to do with being malicious and trying to get away with something. You can't sum people up in one word, because it depends on the situation, it depends on the context, and so many other factors. And as I eluded to, people aren't consistent with the cheater tag. When they start calling other people a cheater...yep, I'll start to believe that it's a genuine philosophical point. But until then, it's just having a dig at McCaw but in a really back handed kind of way. Maybe not for everyone, but a fair few times on this forum I'd say.
What I think could be helpful is taking note of the time in a game (either when you watch it live or back on youtube) and try and be specific in posts about what a player did, and what that poster takes grievance with. Tags are so generalized and vague. I'd be keen to have a discussion on what the alleged issue is. I tried to do that myself when I mentioned before half time around the 34th minute mark Argentina were continuously offside. If someone else is seeing that differently, then it'd be an interesting discussion. But I've tried to pinpoint it, and I haven't just said something for the sake of saying it.
Unless I physically engaged in match fixing like what happens in Cricket, or I inject myself with some performance enhancing drug that is usually outlawed, then I'd be pretty insulted if someone summarized my sporting career in that one word. If I'm going to be known as a cheater then I just won't bother playing. I'd go to a sport that actually respects it's athletes and doesn't talk such drivel. Because I think every situation is different and nuanced.