As a AB's supporter I thoroughly enjoyed that match. I was expecting a big performance this week - we seldom play poorly two matches in the row - but I wasn't expecting it to be quite so comprehensive! I thought the ref had a pretty good game this week too. He did make a couple of errors, but he let the game flow, was very consistent in his rulings, and wasn't afraid to use yellow cards when required (McCaw certainly deserved his yellow!). Some have complained that the 50:50 calls went in favour of the AB's this week. I didn't really notice it my self (bloody All Blacks eye patch always impairs my vision..), but it wouldn't surprise me, as I have always found the dominant side (and the AB's were incredibly dominant....) gets the 50:50 calls (just as Australia probably benefited from these calls last weekend).
On the players:
- Crockett and Franks were better this week, though not overly prominent. They helped destroy the Aussie scrum when it was down to 7 men, but when Australia had their full complement the scrums were pretty even. Even if they weren't that prominent they were obviously doing their job as the forward pack as a whole was very impressive.
- Coles was absolutely outstanding in my opinion. I had concerns when he was introduced last season, but I'm more than happy to have been proved wrong. With his skills he wouldn't look out of place in the backs. He was stepping players, making pinpoint kicks, and making perfectly timed passes. More importantly he was doing his core roles as a hooker brilliantly too. He made all his tackles, hooked the ball well in the scrum, and his lineout throwing was pinpoint accurate. The only problem with him performing so well is that in emphasizes the massive gap in class between him and the rest of the NZ hookers...
- It would have been hard to play better than Coles, but I believe Retallick did that. He was immense. I'm not sure why Australia kept kicking the ball in his direction at the kickoff as his kick-off receptions were world class all night. He was hitting rucks like a mad-man, turning over Australian ball at the breakdown, and made numerous powerful runs in the midfield. He was my man of the match. Sam Whitelock played very well too particularly in the lineout and on defense. They are clearly the premier locking combination in world rugby in my opinion.
- Despite a dominant performance I thought the loose-forwards were perhaps a bit quiet (at least in comparison to Coles and the locks). Messam showed some good line speed on defense, but his handling really let him down in the 1st half, losing the ball 3 times when the AB's were hot on attack. McCaw played a better than last weekend, but I don't think he was as standout IMO. He made his tackles, and made a couple of good runs, but didn't make that much of an impact at the breakdown, and got penalised a couple of times (fully deserving the yellow card). He certainly had a solid game, but not the outstanding match some on the media have suggested (probably on the basis of him scoring 2 tries). Read was the pick of the loose-forwards. He didn't really feature in the wider channels as much as he can (Messam seemed to be out there a lot more for some reason?), but he was very accurate in everything he did, and his lineout ability is a massive asset for the AB's. Luatua took his try very well at the end.
- Aaron Smith was very good this week. His passing was as accurate as ever, and it was good to see him identifying the space close to the breakdown and taking the gaps. He will be disappointed to have missed that tackle on Hooper, but he won't be the last halfback that Hooper goes around!
- Who needs Dan Carter? Cruden had a dominant display at 10. His ability to identify space - either with the boot or through running/passing - is 2nd to none, he made his tackles, and his goal-kicking was accurate (though he did seem to get a lot of easier kicks this weekend). I've said it before but I will say it again: I think Cruden has overtaken Carter as the AB's premier 10.
- Crotty had an outstanding starting debut - it was a pity he had to go off injured at halftime. I thought the backline functioned very well with him at 12. I don't know what has happened to him this season but he almost inevitably breaks the 1st tackle these days, and his defense has always been quality. It is probably too soon to start suggesting it, but I wouldn't mind him continuing to start at 12 even when Nonu is back fit. Obviously he wouldn't provide the game-breaking ability that Nonu can bring, but he brings a stronger defensive game, a better passing game, far less chance of giving away stupid penalties (e.g. no shoulder charges!), and possesses a pretty handy running game in his own right. Conrad Smith was Conrad Smith. It was great to have him back. Fekitoa runs hard and straight but is still a bit raw. If it came down to a choice between Crotty and Fekitoa I would probably opt for Crotty.
- Savea and Jane both played well, but don't actually get that much space out wide as the AB's did a lot of their damage in the centre of the park, and when the ball did get wide it seemed to be the AB's forwards lingering out there (and dropping the ball in Messam's case....). Savea's kick chasing was feature. Ben Smith was outstanding (as usual). Not only did he inevitably break the first tackle, but he was rock solid on defense, dominated in the air, and his passing was a real feature. He continued to put players in gaps that whole first half - the only mistake he made was throwing that intercept pass to Folau (which Barrett did a fantastic job of saving!).
- I have been informed Australian players played in this match too, but I can't recall them doing a lot
- Hooper was a bit of a one man band for Australia, but even he made a few mistakes (mainly missed tackles). Were Fardy and Palu playing?
- White was pretty average again, but Phipps (again) made a good impact when he came on. I'm not a big fan on Phipps, but he has made a strong case to start the Wallabies next test.
- Will the Beale experiment continue? Not only has the attack been rather lateral with him at 10, but the "hide Beale on defense" tactic appears to have led of confusion among the backs on defense. Surely Foley will start at 10 next match?
- There is no doubt Folau is the best attacking fullback in world rugby, but he still has a lot to learn about other aspects of the game. He still doesn't have a great tactical appreciation of a fullbacks role, and still needs to work on linking with his team-mates. I suppose the most impressive thing is that the opposition knows exactly what he is going to do but can't stop him (reminiscent in some ways of the great Christian Cullen). If Folau can add some other aspects to his game he will be less predictable, and even more unstoppable!