- Joined
- Sep 15, 2010
- Messages
- 2,026
There are a couple of reasons we aren't as dominant at this level as previously. Goodnumber10 has identified one (the fact other side have gotten better), but a major reason from a NZ perspective is that we not longer have Dave Rennie coaching (the guy who coached the Chiefs to the last Super Rugby ***les for those who are unfamiliar with the name). NZ sides often struggle size wise at these tournaments. At the lower levels in NZ there is far more of a focus on developing basic skills / rugby nous than bulking up (that comes later) hence we often end up getting destroyed by the bigger forward packs in this tournament. Even when we were dominating the early tournaments our forward packs were often getting hammered by the likes of England and South Africa - the difference was that Rennie had developed a fast-paced style of play that maximised our strengths and minimized our weaknesses. We had highly mobile packs and basically ran other sides off the park. Since Rennie left we have looked a bit lost at this level to be honest. We did win (just) in 2011 (with Anscombe at coach), but we probably our most talented side ever.....
In terms of player production we are still producing just as talented players at U20 level in my opinion. Personally I don't think NZ's decline in fortunes at U20 level will directly lead to a decline in fortunes at the top level....
That is a really good point actually. I don't mean to pick on England, as this probably applies to a few countries but I'll give you a personal example. A couple of years ago I was over in the UK playing footy for a semi pro team. We had a mercenary type set up with a whole lot of foreigners and good English players (ex age grade England players, ex academy players etc, Provincial B players from NZ and some Super rugby B squad guys from Aus/SA). We won like 50 games straight and smashed most teams. Now the poms were physically impressive, always big guys and did the damage for us. But the basic skills in comparison were pretty poor. Our tight 5 couldn't be trusted to catch and pass in open play. Our kiwi number 8 ended up in the centres as he was more skillful than the English guy we had.
We used to hold coaching clinics in the school holidays for kids aged about 12 or so and their comparative skill level to kids back here was miles lower, because most of them had only just started to play the game. They definitely don't have the ball in their hands at age about 4 like we do. I think that's the key to our depth to be honest, the general skill level starts so early and is present in all grades really.
One of my mates plays in the top14 in France and he reckons the same thing, young French guys have comparatively poor skills. He reckons if you were a good young kiwi you should go over there as it is miles easier to make the grade.