• Help Support The Rugby Forum :

Who should host The 2023 Rugby World Cup

Who Sholud host the 2023 Rugby World Cup

  • Ireland

    Votes: 29 63.0%
  • France

    Votes: 7 15.2%
  • South Africa

    Votes: 10 21.7%

  • Total voters
    46
  • Poll closed .
So at no stage during the communication between WR and IRFU, did they ask for more clarity on specific matters?
I don't know... They claim weighting and scoring criteria were only made available to host candidates, not just the IRFU, on 31 October. If that was wrong you'd presume WR could prove it, or one of the FFR or SARU because it's pretty damning on WR and the recommendation as a whole if correct.
 
I don't know... They claim weighting and scoring criteria were only made available to host candidates, not just the IRFU, on 31 October. If that was wrong you'd presume WR could prove it, or one of the FFR or SARU because it's pretty damning on WR and the recommendation as a whole if correct.

Perhaps it's more a question of introspection??

Why is only Ireland of the 3 questioning the weighting and scoring? Nothing prevents the other 2 from also complaining about it even if their scores are better than Ireland's. They could argue that their scores in certain criterias are too low.
 
Perhaps it's more a question of introspection??

Why is only Ireland of the 3 questioning the weighting and scoring? Nothing prevents the other 2 from also complaining about it even if their scores are better than Ireland's. They could argue that their scores in certain criterias are too low.
Laporte has said much worse things about the entire process, SARU would be shooting themselves in the foot to complain about a process that has them on top. The entire letter seems reads as if, when in communication with the evaluation team, Ireland were told x, y and z aspects of their bid were great and then got no reward for it in the scoring, it might be made up, it might not be but WR or the other unions obviously can't prove if it is because if they did Ireland's bid would be dead in the water. I don't think there is any dispute as to whether or not this is a tactic to undermine the recommendation in order for the Unions to dismiss it when voting but they've done it by bringing up valid points or points that can't be disputed for whatever reason, while promoting the aspects of the Irish bid that they feel are better than South Africa's that weren't counted in the report. Its politics and its all above board and not abusive, unlike the French, SARU would certainly be attempting the same thing if it wasn't better for them to sit on their recommendation.
 
Laporte has said much worse things about the entire process, SARU would be shooting themselves in the foot to complain about a process that has them on top. The entire letter seems reads as if, when in communication with the evaluation team, Ireland were told x, y and z aspects of their bid were great and then got no reward for it in the scoring, it might be made up, it might not be but WR or the other unions obviously can't prove if it is because if they did Ireland's bid would be dead in the water. I don't think there is any dispute as to whether or not this is a tactic to undermine the recommendation in order for the Unions to dismiss it when voting but they've done it by bringing up valid points or points that can't be disputed for whatever reason, while promoting the aspects of the Irish bid that they feel are better than South Africa's that weren't counted in the report. Its politics and its all above board and not abusive, unlike the French, SARU would certainly be attempting the same thing if it wasn't better for them to sit on their recommendation.

Above board is a bit over the top.

Clearly the remarks by both FFR and IRFU is not abiding by the code of conduct they agreed to when they started their bid.
 
Above board is a bit over the top.

Clearly the remarks by both FFR and IRFU is not abiding by the code of conduct they agreed to when they started their bid.
Is that clear? Do you have the code of conduct and where have the IRFU expressly breached it? The FFR are a different matter.

A code of conduct denying the right to make queries over valid concerns, and not making any statements that they're incorrect, would be ridiculous.

I also imagine urging another bid to drop out would be against that code of conduct.
 
Entitled and righteous? Says the one acting like your bid is beyond reproach because you've waited long enough.

My comments are directly addressing the crime rate issue.

My point was we've been hunting the cup for a good while now, not that deserve it purely based on not hosting it more recently then the other two, but that we've been preparing for a considerably long time and therefore have a calculated and refined bid that's more than adequate imo. That Ireland and France are hyper focused on our crime rate like it's the main factor governing who will receive the tournament and they're seemingly trying to use it to disregard the many positives we have in our bid.

You'll also notice that I made that point from MY perspective not my countries, it's my opinion not a reason I think we should host, I want to experience the RWC and think it's been plenty long enough since we last hosted.

You seem keen to focus on this statement rather than address the fact that we have a well weighted bid. I stated the reasons I think we should host the cup, and "We are first in line because we haven't hosted it as recently." was not one of them.

It's not about entitlement, it's about fairly questioning a new report method that isn't nearly as transparent to the unions and public as was promised.

Your opinion and that's fair enough. I see both unions publicly disregarding the positive aspects of our bid by focusing specifically on our crime rate, they feel they should've scored much higher like it was the only consideration or criteria. It seems to me that both unions think they're entitled to better evaluations because of this. I'm emotional because instead of raising a huge stink about why they should've scored higher they could've stated their facts and approached WR through more appropriate channels but instead decided to get political.

Stop setting up strawmen points that literally no one made like "Africa is a crime ridden hellhole and our countries are the embodiment of serenity" for yourself to knock down and address the polite and fairly reasoned points we actually made if you want a reasonable discussion.

Scathing remarks aside, I was obviously using hyperbole to demonstrate the fact that I think the crime rate issue is being overblown into something more than it is. I apologise for being impolite but please take some time to look again at this thread and the statements made by the unions, scribes and countries and see for yourself the numerous comments regarding the crime rate, the comparative safety of the countries and the snide remarks about how SA is not nearly as safe as Ireland. We know it's true, but we also know that SA has the proven capability to host a safe tournament. There are numerous instances now of quotes and statistics of rape, murder, theft being thrown around and discourse is becoming increasingly frenzied.

I simply don't think that these countries should be making these statements unchecked and that the bids should simply speak for themselves.

I completely understand why you have taken such umbrage to my comments and admit I was quick to post unguarded and perhaps misinformed sentiments but I implore you try to understand why the saffas are feeling attacked by the other two countries. The European countries think it's unfair we came out on top, and we think it's unfair that they're attempting to muddy our bid by singling out one aspect of it.

Serously though, ultimately the Tournaments interest should be the priority, I want a great RWC just like everyone else and each bid has it's own pros and cons, the voting will happen no matter the objections to the evaluation process, just seems that there are a lot of political cheap shots being landed on all sides which is bringing the whole process unnecessarily into disrepute.

It might not be the way you see it but that's how I do. Perhaps my country is not as squeaky clean and our bid not as refined as I'm making it out to be but I don't think your countries actions are as defensible as you and others are making them out to be either but I appreciate my opinions being challenged, so thanks for that :p
 
Well if we win the bid on Wednesday. It will be the first time a tier 2 Nation will be hosting it...

I understand that you are emotional but Japan is a Tier 2 nation. :)

And congratulations on the new baby!!!
 
Regarding security in Ireland, having been to many Ireland v Wales games I have never had a problem or concern.

It's to their credit as a country (North & South) that things are a heck of a lot more peaceful now than years ago. Yes, there are 'Provo' gangs, but nothing at all like the IRA/UDF/UFF etc. of the past.

South Africa should be boycotted in support of the Whites being murdered. Un-PC as this may sound, but racism applies to all races.

France only recently hosted the RWC, but then again the UK hosted the one in 2015 - not too long after 1999. Hopefully it would be a calmer France in 2023 than today, and that any tournament there would go ahead without the risk of nut-jobs.
 
Regarding security in Ireland, having been to many Ireland v Wales games I have never had a problem or concern.

It's to their credit as a country (North & South) that things are a heck of a lot more peaceful now than years ago. Yes, there are 'Provo' gangs, but nothing at all like the IRA/UDF/UFF etc. of the past.

South Africa should be boycotted in support of the Whites being murdered. Un-PC as this may sound, but racism applies to all races.

France only recently hosted the RWC, but then again the UK hosted the one in 2015 - not too long after 1999. Hopefully it would be a calmer France in 2023 than today, and that any tournament there would go ahead without the risk of nut-jobs.

Again, what does the farm murders have to do with us hosting the tournament??? Those farm murders include black farmers as well as farm workers being murdered.

Anyway, today is D-day! Here's hoping we win it.
 
Rumours that the WRU voted SA and knocked Ireland out. Rodents.

SA were probably willing to give them that game in Cardiff.

We'll just have to ravage their land and kill their ewes.

Live stream here:

of the announcement, not me killing ewes.
 
Last edited:
France hosting it is something of a joke. There should have been a rule about not being able to apply if you've hosted within a certain amount of time. Make rugby look small.

Still I'm sure it will be a fine tournament and I might even try and go.

Sad that we'll never get to host one now unless rugby stagnates massively. Would have been a hell of a party.
 
I would have 100% preferred Ireland over france. France was the one country that did not deserve it. They just had it.
Would like to know who voted for who. Enemies has been made.
 
Top