- Joined
- May 25, 2007
- Messages
- 5,708
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
Wales' try should never have been allowed.
[textarea]LAW 19.2 (d) For a quick throw-in, the player must use the ball that went into touch. A quick throw-in is not permitted if another person has touched the ball apart from the player throwing it in and an opponent who carried it into touch. The same team throws into the lineout.[/textarea]
The ball was handled by a spectator, and it was also handled by another Welsh player other then the thrower, so no quick throw in should have been permitted.
There is some suggestion that it was not a "quick throw-in" but a "quickly taken line-out" instead....
[textarea]Law 19.8 (a) Minimum. At least two players from each team must form a lineout.[/textarea]
There were not two players from each team, and in any case, the throw was not taken from the line-of-touch, nor was it anywhere near straight, both of which are requirements for a "quickly taken line-out."
Kaplan asked if it was the same ball, so he MUST be thinking "quick throw-in" not "quickly taken line-out" because the latter can be done using a different ball (so there would be no need to ask about it)
This is a very bad law error, and a critical one, that affected the outcome of the game. The Assistant Referee should go for a skate.
PS: This is yet another reason why the TMO protocols should be extended to ANYTHING that happens immediately prior to a try being scored. Kaplan then asks the TMO (who was in a much better position then the AR) about the QT.
[textarea]LAW 19.2 (d) For a quick throw-in, the player must use the ball that went into touch. A quick throw-in is not permitted if another person has touched the ball apart from the player throwing it in and an opponent who carried it into touch. The same team throws into the lineout.[/textarea]
The ball was handled by a spectator, and it was also handled by another Welsh player other then the thrower, so no quick throw in should have been permitted.
There is some suggestion that it was not a "quick throw-in" but a "quickly taken line-out" instead....
[textarea]Law 19.8 (a) Minimum. At least two players from each team must form a lineout.[/textarea]
There were not two players from each team, and in any case, the throw was not taken from the line-of-touch, nor was it anywhere near straight, both of which are requirements for a "quickly taken line-out."
Kaplan asked if it was the same ball, so he MUST be thinking "quick throw-in" not "quickly taken line-out" because the latter can be done using a different ball (so there would be no need to ask about it)
This is a very bad law error, and a critical one, that affected the outcome of the game. The Assistant Referee should go for a skate.
PS: This is yet another reason why the TMO protocols should be extended to ANYTHING that happens immediately prior to a try being scored. Kaplan then asks the TMO (who was in a much better position then the AR) about the QT.