j'nuh
First XV
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2011
- Messages
- 4,209
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
Maybe I'm being extremely cynical... anyone else think Priestland's "sabbatical" is to allow Faletau to leave Wales and still get picked?
Gatland's words on previously not sanctioning the Faletau move:
It just seems so very convenient timing that Priestland announces his sabbatical around the same time that Dragons have put in a transfer request for Faletau. Also convenient that Priestland has announced an 18 month sabbatical - long enough to take him to the end of his contract with Bath presumably. He moves back to Wales at the end and picks up his Wales career again.
(All just a little speculation.)
Gatland's words on previously not sanctioning the Faletau move:
(http://www.skysports.com/rugby-unio...-wales-number-eight-toby-faletau-joining-bath)"Given that Wales has such a small playing base with just four teams, we definitely want to keep our players in Wales," Gatland explained on Sky Sports News HQ.
"I have dispensation to pick a couple of players playing outside of Wales. For this year it is two and if Toby Faletau goes to Bath then he will be regarded as a non-qualified Welsh player and I can only pick two of those players.
"At the moment, Jamie Roberts is gone to Harlequins and Rhys Priestland is gone to Bath. If Faletau goes to Bath as well that will be three and I can only pick two of those after the World Cup.
"So I'd be limiting myself and why would I want to do that? Unless something changes, hopefully he will be staying in Wales."
It just seems so very convenient timing that Priestland announces his sabbatical around the same time that Dragons have put in a transfer request for Faletau. Also convenient that Priestland has announced an 18 month sabbatical - long enough to take him to the end of his contract with Bath presumably. He moves back to Wales at the end and picks up his Wales career again.
(All just a little speculation.)