I'm not comparing Donald to Cruden
I just think when people cast judgement on players like donald they need to look at the big picture, as I pointed out donald has 19 caps. Of those 19 in my opinion and I do think I'm a fair judge on it. He's only had 1 for sure and 3 at the most performances that I would say were not up to scratch. People tend to focus on those performances and forget that he's also had some game turning and match winning performances for the all blacks as well. And as I've also pointed out he's never had a bad game off the bench and he's never had a bad game in NZ.
he and Rokocoko copped the flack on message boards for the poor tri nations last year when it was clear and obvious to me that the lineout was the clear and obvious difference between the AB's and Springbok. The AB's IMO would have won the 2nd & 3rd springbok tests with a lineout that was up to standard.
Look around NZ rugby... Carter and Donald are the only two first 5's in NZ rugby that have proven long term track records at Super and international level. And they are the top two best punting & goal kicking 10's in NZ.
Delainy, Slade, Burquest, Repia, kirkpatrick, Brett & Cruden - none of them have even been able to take ownership of a super14 #10 jersey yet.
I honestly believe Donald has a role to play for the AB's yet, look at his form now, the skillset, experience and attributes he has makes him very important.
Next would have to be Slade im my book he will get a good run for the highlanders and he needs to prove he can kick for goal ~75%+
2011 just may be too early for cruden to get settled at international level. Considering he maybe hasn't finished getting up to super level, plus his goal & positional kicking isn't up to the mark and that should be the first thing he gets sorted. For sure he's got some spunk though and could be a real asset come 2015 RWC