psychic duck
International
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2011
- Messages
- 5,094
I've never predicted they'd score 100 against Japan, why do you keep bringing it up in reference to me?
RE: camp/warm ups, it was an "and/or" statement sorry that you didn't understand, but it was written rather clumsily granted. In the June internationals such as when they play Japan in the PNC they will have been in camp leading up to it or will have played say Japan with possibly some PNC games behind them. They will be heading into this game completely cold.
I mean FFS they drew with Uruguay in the RWC qualifiers.
Like i said they don't have the backs to stand up to an AB's or even AB's (b) team, which is vastly different to playing a NZ maoris team that was no where near the strength of the current AB's squad, even then they leaked 3 tries to 1.
NZ score on average 25-30 points against the Tier 1 nations. Do you honestly think USA Eagles are half the strength of SA, Australia or England? They will be on the end of a pasting.
But you're right i'm being too flippant about the Eagles, i'll adjust my predicted score again to reflect your points.
The ab's to get around 58 points.
The camp/warm up point is totally inaccurate though. Before the Ireland game, they had none of their dozen European based players around until the week before the game. In actual fact over the two weekends prior Manoa had played for Northampton in the Premiership final and in Hong Kong for the Barbarians, in his case he would have been in his three totally different time zones in 2 weeks going into that game.
So I don't really regard that as particularly superior preparation to what it will be for this game. In fact it was probably far worse, as the European based players were coming into it at the end of a long season. The American based players would have joined camp before the European based players arrived, but they will this time too so that is hardly different. What were the warm up games before the Maori game? If you're counting ARC they're playing that this year too, but unlike that game with a weakened team their best players will be involved.
Tallying up tries doesn't really add to whatever argument you're trying to make either, when there are so many variable conditions to each and every individual game. And by the way just to make clear, I'm not arguing that the AB's won't get past 60, just that suggesting that is the bare minimum is far from the mark.
And the 100 points reference was to some predictions people made for the Japan game last year. I just tried to clear that up in my last post which you've ignored.
Last edited: