• Help Support The Rugby Forum :

USA news & politics

AGain, its importqntnto be sccurate, and not utilise inflated numbers to justify your argument, in this case your using Trumps own inflated numbers as justification.

Obama averaged 400k per year and peaked at 440k.

Trump term 1 averaged 240k in term 1, and 2025 is estimated at beteen 300k and 330k.

DHS changing the way it reports, and inflating the numbers for Trumps bragging doesnt mean its 600k.

Now theres a discussion to be had about self deportations, and the widened scope of all illegals and not just those who are illegal and commited further crimes, but as it stands Obama, even if we compare year on year is still sitting pretty with the title of deporrer and chief.
Article: The Obama Record on Deportations: Deporte.. | migrationpolicy.org https://share.google/MQt2yeyh5hDQ6tuEG

Yet this completely contradicts your claim...
 
Article: The Obama Record on Deportations: Deporte.. | migrationpolicy.org https://share.google/MQt2yeyh5hDQ6tuEG

Yet this completely contradicts your claim...

I think you find it doesnt, look at rhe numbers...

Obama deportations 3 million
Bush deportations 2 million
Clinton deportations 900k

Obama is still riding high compared to every modern day president, it says it right there, however i will concede Obamas average doesnt quite touch 400k per year.
 
I think you find it doesnt, look at rhe numbers...

Obama deportations 3 million
Bush deportations 2 million
Clinton deportations 900k

Obama is still riding high compared to every modern day president, it says it right there, however i will concede Obamas average doesnt quite touch 400k per year.
Except you are cherry picking by ignoring returns. I suggest you look at the numbers.
 
Except you are cherry picking by ignoring returns. I suggest you look at the numbers.

Once again, and i dont mean it in a disrespecful way, you dont understand.

A Removal is a term that means offically kicked out of the US, it requires a judge to sign off, and has a re entry ban. This is called a deportation.

A return is informal. If someone walks across the border, sees a US officer, and turns back, thats a return. Theres no reason to even ID them, and theres no restricyions on re entry. Most returns, certainly for the Bush and Clinton eras were forced turn arounds at the border.

The reason Obama was different, was that he built facilities (later to be referred to as Trumps cages) and captured and formally removed (deported) people, ensuring there were consequences to re entry attempts.

Obama prided himself on stopping the flow, and deincentivising illegal crossing in the first place, hence why his deportations sky rocketed, and hes lack of interest in returns dropped.

So yes, he was Deporter in chief, and yes his aggressive border policy, not just deportations, but ICEs increased funding, power and reach, has paved the way for Trump to utilise it, and well essentially try to break his record, which thus far, if you believe his numbers (im not sure you believe much he says) he is on track as of 2025, but if independant sources are believed in reality hes lagging behind Obama by quite a bit.
 
Once again, and i dont mean it in a disrespecful way, you dont understand.

A Removal is a term that means offically kicked out of the US, it requires a judge to sign off, and has a re entry ban. This is called a deportation.

A return is informal. If someone walks across the border, sees a US officer, and turns back, thats a return. Theres no reason to even ID them, and theres no restricyions on re entry. Most returns, certainly for the Bush and Clinton eras were forced turn arounds at the border.

The reason Obama was different, was that he built facilities (later to be referred to as Trumps cages) and captured and formally removed (deported) people, ensuring there were consequences to re entry attempts.

Obama prided himself on stopping the flow, and deincentivising illegal crossing in the first place, hence why his deportations sky rocketed, and hes lack of interest in returns dropped.

So yes, he was Deporter in chief, and yes his aggressive border policy, not just deportations, but ICEs increased funding, power and reach, has paved the way for Trump to utilise it, and well essentially try to break his record, which thus far, if you believe his numbers (im not sure you believe much he says) he is on track as of 2025, but if independant sources are believed in reality hes lagging behind Obama by quite a bit.
Yes I do understand and I do know the difference. However removals also include people who are threatened with forced deportion but leave of their own accord. It's not just someone turning around and going back at the border if they see a border guard as those would rarely if ever be caught let alone recorded.

If Obama was as bad then explain why we didn't see the ICE incidents we are now. Going to do the usual of claiming it's all a liberal conspiracy?
 
Yes I do understand and I do know the difference. However removals also include people who are threatened with forced deportion but leave of their own accord. It's not just someone turning around and going back at the border if they see a border guard as those would rarely if ever be caught let alone recorded.

If Obama was as bad then explain why we didn't see the ICE incidents we are now. Going to do the usual of claiming it's all a liberal conspiracy?

If you understood you wouldnt have tried to conflate Bushs 10 million returns with deportations, in a conversation about Obama being the Deporter in chief.

Returns can be anything, like Trumps payments to return now, will be classed as returns. Theyre not all at the border, but most are, or i should say were, as Trump is clai.ing 1.9million last year i cant imagine its that high, probably like his removal figures 60% seems a more accurate number.

So this is a good question, there are a number of reasons for this, some obvious some not so.

1. Most obviously, technology was not as prevelant or advanced as it was in 2014/2015. Body cams, live feeds, platforms to share those videos etc have all exploded in the last decade.

2. Political division. During the Obama years, Republicans cheered on his immigration policies, both parties, and general public consensus, especially amongst Mexicans was anti illegal immigration. Republicans werent on TV screaming for ICE to 'get the **** out of my city' and calling for rebellion and war (i think Waltz called it).

3. Obama focussed his efforts, and had a higher deportation ratio on the border, he built the cages, and its much easier to keep deportations out of public view in rural Texas and California, than urban Minneaplois. Instead of returning them from where they came, Obama imprisoned, booked and deported ensuring they couldnt return legally.

4. Population mobilization and radicalisation was nowhere nesr the same levels it is now. Tech has allowed people to mobilise and weaponise at an instant, in 2015 middle aged socder mums couldnt, and wouldnt have dropped the kids off at school, and checked their phone bored and got an alert agents were a few blocks away. Algorithms are radicalising once thoughtful and smart people, into believing they have a moral duty to become violent, as rage sells 10 times better than any other emotion evoked, especially in the new age short form content.

I was just doing a bot of doom scrolling and my algorithm is wild, pro and anti Trump stuff, and within a 10 minute period i saw a short of a person making the claim Good was literally pulling out of her driveway and was executed, AND that she was part of an anti ICE terror group stalking and doxxing agents, before trying to run one over at 40mph.

So im not saying Obama was as bad as Trump on immigration, i dont put a good bad in it, im not pro or against these policies because 1. Its not my country and 2. The US got what they voted for, hes doing exactly what he said on the tin.

Obama deported more, thats factual. Obama paved the wsy for Trump, thats factual.
 
If you understood you wouldnt have tried to conflate Bushs 10 million returns with deportations, in a conversation about Obama being the Deporter in chief.

Returns can be anything, like Trumps payments to return now, will be classed as returns. Theyre not all at the border, but most are, or i should say were, as Trump is clai.ing 1.9million last year i cant imagine its that high, probably like his removal figures 60% seems a more accurate number.

So this is a good question, there are a number of reasons for this, some obvious some not so.

1. Most obviously, technology was not as prevelant or advanced as it was in 2014/2015. Body cams, live feeds, platforms to share those videos etc have all exploded in the last decade.

2. Political division. During the Obama years, Republicans cheered on his immigration policies, both parties, and general public consensus, especially amongst Mexicans was anti illegal immigration. Republicans werent on TV screaming for ICE to 'get the **** out of my city' and calling for rebellion and war (i think Waltz called it).

3. Obama focussed his efforts, and had a higher deportation ratio on the border, he built the cages, and its much easier to keep deportations out of public view in rural Texas and California, than urban Minneaplois. Instead of returning them from where they came, Obama imprisoned, booked and deported ensuring they couldnt return legally.

4. Population mobilization and radicalisation was nowhere nesr the same levels it is now. Tech has allowed people to mobilise and weaponise at an instant, in 2015 middle aged socder mums couldnt, and wouldnt have dropped the kids off at school, and checked their phone bored and got an alert agents were a few blocks away. Algorithms are radicalising once thoughtful and smart people, into believing they have a moral duty to become violent, as rage sells 10 times better than any other emotion evoked, especially in the new age short form content.

I was just doing a bot of doom scrolling and my algorithm is wild, pro and anti Trump stuff, and within a 10 minute period i saw a short of a person making the claim Good was literally pulling out of her driveway and was executed, AND that she was part of an anti ICE terror group stalking and doxxing agents, before trying to run one over at 40mph.

So im not saying Obama was as bad as Trump on immigration, i dont put a good bad in it, im not pro or against these policies because 1. Its not my country and 2. The US got what they voted for, hes doing exactly what he said on the tin.

Obama deported more, thats factual. Obama paved the wsy for Trump, thats factual.
1. Not true, smartphones were already commonplace during the Obama years. Whilst tiktok didn't exist, Facebook, YouTube, Instagram and others like Snapchat were also well established.

2. There was tons of political division. Republicans were even having a go at Obama for wearing a tan suit and having mustard on his hotdog, plus the yearly fictional war on Christmas. They were constantly trying to frame him as an autocratic dictator who ignored the rule of law. Given that, you want to claim they wouldn't have jumped on the opportunity to use ICE incidents to attack him?

3. Focused efforts is correct. Meanwhile Trump is wielding it like a sledgehammer and using it to actively threaten entire states. Not much of a threat if they're not going ahead with it.

4. Not as bad as now but it was definitely radicalised during the Obama era. The left despised the right after what Bush did and the right despised Obama and attempted to block absolutely everything he did whilst portraying him as a dictator. The difference was the reasoning, the string dislikes of Bush was for real things like Iraq and his mishandling of the hurricane Katrina response. Dislike for Obama was largely from fabricated things like the war on Christmas, Katrina (yes I saw Republicans who blamed him for that), the financial crisis (real but happened under Bush), claims he was going to ignore the Constitution and have a 3rd term, claims the supreme court was full of lefty activist judges (it had a right wing majority his entire term) etc.
 
1. Not true, smartphones were already commonplace during the Obama years. Whilst tiktok didn't exist, Facebook, YouTube, Instagram and others like Snapchat were also well established.

2. There was tons of political division. Republicans were even having a go at Obama for wearing a tan suit and having mustard on his hotdog, plus the yearly fictional war on Christmas. They were constantly trying to frame him as an autocratic dictator who ignored the rule of law. Given that, you want to claim they wouldn't have jumped on the opportunity to use ICE incidents to attack him?

3. Focused efforts is correct. Meanwhile Trump is wielding it like a sledgehammer and using it to actively threaten entire states. Not much of a threat if they're not going ahead with it.

4. Not as bad as now but it was definitely radicalised during the Obama era. The left despised the right after what Bush did and the right despised Obama and attempted to block absolutely everything he did whilst portraying him as a dictator. The difference was the reasoning, the string dislikes of Bush was for real things like Iraq and his mishandling of the hurricane Katrina response. Dislike for Obama was largely from fabricated things like the war on Christmas, Katrina (yes I saw Republicans who blamed him for that), the financial crisis (real but happened under Bush), claims he was going to ignore the Constitution and have a 3rd term, claims the supreme court was full of lefty activist judges (it had a right wing majority his entire term) etc.

1. Well this is bad faith isnt it? Why would you prerend that social media, and the culture of its use is the same now as 2015? Well we know why dont we...
Social media, including Tik tok and live streaming has radixally chamged the landscape, Tik tok alone accounts for 150 million users in the USA, mainly by younger people, and 55% of them say they get their news there!!! Even if we ignore the massive growth and the live facilities going from so few hours of viewed content, that therenisnt reliable nu.bers, in 2015 to nearly 10 billion hours in the 3rd quarter of 2025. We know numbers have more than 5x since 2019.
This puts your counter to bed, its bad faith and non sensical.

2. Again this is bad faith and kot based in reality. There isnt one single poster here who would agree polarisation was the same in 2015 than it is today, especially in regards to ICE. Infsct id probably argue youve only just come across who they based on your assumptions of them not being federal, or law enforcement etc...
The change in how people consume news, the rise of algorithms, the change from cyclic news to 24/7 bombardment, and the anti Trump extremes are going after ICE currently, after transitioning from BLM, then from Ukraine, Gaza, now theres people on the streets of USA calling to liberate Maduro lol.
Mocking a tan suit, even the stupid birther theory, are absolutely not on the scale of telking people to attack Trump, his cabinet and supporters in the street, making up Russian hooker allegations, calling the government of the USA at war with rhe people etc...
Republicans were sucxessful at obstructing Obama policies, Democrats have been wildly ridiculous at times, you have Democrats jumping into the middle of arrests in front of cameras, causing scrums and trying to sneak people into detenition centres, calling to totally abolish ICE, warning activist groups of ICE operations, calling ICE terrorists and Nazis etc...

None of this happened with rhe Republicans pre 2016, when Republicans wanted to oppose Obama on immigration they both went after legality and policy.

3. I think we agree here, Obamas silent catana out of view was much smoother than Trumps sledgehammer, more effective in deporting people, but better at keeping it out of public view.

4. Not as bad as now?
Its 2 different worlds, there are literally people online doxxing agents, calling for an assasination of Trump and ICE agents daily, there are mobs currently in Minnesota harrasing members of the public accusing them of being ICE and seraching their cars for evidence, roads are blocked, masses are being interupted with rumours a pastor is an ICE supporter...
Ironically i just watched a BLM activist currently performing anti ICE actions make a speach about gettingnout of Minnesota, theyre not from here they dont belong here, they should leave Minnesota to Minnesotans, words Waltz has also used, like its not the gretaest irony that theyve become right wing nationalists over night, and are now implimenting SS tactics to get whay they want lol.
Even you have to laugh at the irony of left wing mobs harrassing randoms, asking for papers, and trying to deport non Minnesotans hahaha.

Again, polarisation increased maybe from Bush to Obama, probably because Obama policies untied the Republicans more, especially on healthcare and financial reform, but again i dont remember Republicans calling for war, fighting with federal agencies, going afyer democrats in the street etc, and yes part of that is that social media now amplifies that 50x more than it did in 2015, bit mostly 2015 Republicans seemed far more dignified and mature (even if i disagreed with some of their policies and stupid framing of Obama).

Ultimately 2015 was a more dignified world, i remember being mocked at my rugby club in 2012 for trying to stay up and watch election night live, in 2024 it was a mass social occasion.

People, and im going to include yourself sadly, have been radicalised, to the point they make non sensical claims about social media being the same in 2015 as 2025, soccer mums are getting into federal agents faces, instigating violence, ICE agents are being doxxed and hunted, vehicles and buildings attacked... you have all been convinxed that politics is tied to your personal morality, you cant critically think about Trump whatsoever, everything he does and says has to be perceived as the most radicalised version of what you want to confirm your thoughts, everything is umprecedented and never seen before, thisnis the biggest threat to the world blah blah blah...

Just take a breath, sit back and consider all ive said above, my point os not to obsficaye Trump of his responsibility, becaise hes absolutely responsible, his manner, messaging and certainly this seconds rerm agression in which hes trying to impliment policies, are a large part of things, but playing the same game has continuously emboldened him, and well he is a product of political failings from Obama and the rest of the mainstream who, largely made decisions not based in the best interest of the people.

The swamp absolutely existed in 2015, and i dont blame Americans for voting for Trump whatsoever in 2016, it made total sense. What should have happened was an intrinsic soul search of what they did wrong, and Democrats could have restructured and found a common sense platform to take the party forward from 2020. Sadly they never, and have become the Anti Trump reactive team blue, and alienated further people who have leaned into Trump and well, here we have the result of that.
 
I think we are talking across each other, because we arr both reiterating points at each other lol, and i think theres something missing.

The president, or all politicians having the ability to move markets in real time and profit have absolutely happened, i just gave you a list. Bush made an absolute bucket load right after 9/11 and then making the decision to gonto war, knowing he would become even richer was worse than a coin, that was a decision knowing he would benefit from it.

Look at the COVID scumbags, on intelligence meetings, and dumping stocks hourse before recomending lockdowns, or even more modern, look at Illan Omar. She used her consultant boyfriend on her first campaign and paid him massively, then married him, and he went from being an advertising guru to a venture capitalist and wine entreprenaur, before those 2 companies went from 10k valuations to 10s of millions within a year or so of her election, or Pelosis husband cashing in on wildly lucky trade hours before his wife anounces legislation change, literally, moments before Pelosi guided an Act that gave 50 billion plus to tech companies, hes throwing millions at tech companies hahahaha.

Theres a reason they keep the trade disclosures at 45 days, and theres a reason that not 1 person has been prosecuted under the stock act, despite 50+ members have confirmed to have broken it, and the latest estimated figure is that 12 to 15% of trades break it.

Trumps coin could provide an avenue for foreign investment for political exposure, thats called pay tonplay and its rife in Congress. The Clintons did it through their charity, Cheney and Bush did it with Halliburton, obamas campaign donors were involved in Solyndra, they managed to buy influence and secured half a billion dollars, before cashing in and going bankrupt (although this is a less egregious case, unless it was just a case of Obama covering his arse better who knows).

So your idea, trump coin could enable 'buying political exposure' is spot on, and absolurely typical for US politics.

I suppose your right, Crypto isnunprecedented, because most other presidents keep their dodgy lobbyist and pay for play dealings as secret as possible.
Yeah. Trumps corruption is right out in the open. It’s so brazen.

I don’t deny political insider trading and pay to play already exist, you’re right about that.

The difference is structural, those schemes were hidden, indirect, or delayed. Trump Coin is a public, real-time, tradeable asset whose price tracks the political success of a sitting president while he holds the upside.

That creates an open market for buying political exposure with instant liquidity.

Corruption isn’t new, a live political speculation token is.
 
Big rumor circulating here is Trump is also looking to acquire Iceland.

Something around thermal potential and controlling the Arctic circle shipping routes.

Unsure how we can absorb Iceland. Or how much is it will cost.
 
Big rumor circulating here is Trump is also looking to acquire Iceland.

Something around thermal potential and controlling the Arctic circle shipping routes.

Unsure how we can absorb Iceland. Or how much is it will cost.
B/S. More like the idiot got it confused with Greenland and not for the first time. This will be your army at this rate.


1000403351.jpg
 
B/S. More like the idiot got it confused with Greenland and not for the first time. This will be your army at this rate.


View attachment 25387
Nah, you could take it over with Drones. No need to deploy troops.

Apparently Greenland is ours if we really push. Very excited to purchase a new world map showing our territorial expansion.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top