I think there's two slightly different questions the original film is 'are artificial beings real', the second one is 'is the love between artificial beings real'. The second question on really gets asked cursory if you come down on one side of the Deckard debate. Whereas its the central motivation for K/Joy.
Not seen it yet, but I suppose it's seeing their rise through his eyes?
I've only seen the trailers, its getting good reviews especially Smith's performance. But its half past-November so its about the right time for films to start making Oscar noise nothing suggest its any better than any other biopic (cards on the table I've gone more and more off biopics as years go by).
What's their beef with him/the movie?
No their beef is with me saying I probably won't see it mainly because I don't understand why you'd make a film about his accomplishments rather than his daughters and infer their success is only because of him.
Oh yeah it's been weird like Wandavision and Shang-Chi were great. What If was over the place and Cap+Winter/Black Widow forgettable. We just watch it because it's what we like mostly. Eternal has been the first thing they've produced where I've been strongly feeling thats not my jam.
Kind of along the lines of the Persuit of Happiness but this time Tennis and not stocks and shares. I broadly know the story having followed the Williams sisters when watching the tennis. It Is a remarkable rise; I am sure driven by Richard Williams. Tennis is rightly seen as a bit of a rich persons sport and how much time, money and effort to get to the top. And the background of the family. I recall they lived in a really rough area of LA. Sister got shot/murdered whilst the Williams sisters still playing.
I mean I'll admit it's hard to tell when you do know but as someone who's interest in Tennis 'when Wimbledon's on'. I definitely know the story you could barely escape during their rise to fame. It's a bit like not knowing when Lewis Hamilton came from and the stuggles of his father (Richard definitely is more interesting of the two mind).
Documentaries tend to make more interesting things than bionics. I doubt they'd make a Murray one especially involving Dunblane. My understanding its deifntely a topic he doesn't unless he brings ot up want to talk about (understandable).
