Japan it Is!!!!
An Italian rugby blog wrote an article saying that Singapore Rugby Union retired its entrace proposal to leave space to Japan,anybody can confirm it ?
Congrats Japan!
It's official !! SANZAR CEO Greg Peters announced the inclusion of a franchise from Argentina and one from Japan to the SR, plus a new team from South Africa.
i thought this was going to be too obvious tbh, the Japanese are simply much stronger than singapore but congrats![]()
The reality is, it was a no-brainer. Japan is a much stronger rugby country in every respect; playing, supporting, covering. They are also hosting the RWC in 2019; what a snub it would be from SANZAR if Singapore were awarded a SR franchise ahead of Japan.
If Singapore ever were in the hunt, the dreadful spinal injury to Welshman Owen Williams probably killed it. He sustained the injury in the World Club 10's tournament held in Singapore's new National Stadium, where the ground conditions were very substandard and were the major contributing factor in the accident. As recently as last month, the playing surface was still a patchy, sandy mess...
http://www.establishmentpost.com/singapore-sports-hub-pitch-far-perfect-whos-blame/
![]()
NOTE: If you haven't already seen how Owen Williams got his injury, you're probably better off staying that way!
the ground conditions were very substandard and were the major contributing factor in the accident. As recently as last month, the playing surface was still a patchy, sandy mess...
So Super Rugby now officially covers Australasia, Africa, Asia and South America...
I feel now may well also be hitting the point of irreversible damage to Super Rugby. It's not that I'm unhappy with expanding - however expanding as they have will undoubtedly turn an already haphazard conference system, into a dog's breakfast. If they organized this in terms of a round robin system where every team just has to suck up a one-off additional trip to Asia/South America then I would be fine - but I'm not convinced that who meets at the end of the conference systems will accurately reflect the best teams in the competition. It's already BS frankly - where New Zealand gets punished for a strong conference - and teams which have earned less points still get a guaranteed top 3 spot - but now I'm not convinced the table will really reflect the quality of the teams at all. That said, I could be wrong as I don't have the Masters Degree in applied mathematics to know where any of the teams will in reality stand in the table..
Is that stadium the same as "the sports hub" mentioned in this article, Cooky
http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/super-rugby/63402136/Japan-Argentina-officially-join-Super-Rugby
It appears Singapore will get three games anyway
I would have thought the atrocious shirt collar yank and roll tackle that flipped him on his head at full pace was the major contributing factor not a sandy pitch.
It's a clearly less than optimal pitch but i don' think it can be blamed for what was essentially a freak accident from poor tacking technique.
There was no penalty and no citing for the player involved, so it wasn't that dangerous and the seriousness of the injury was blamed in the playing surface at the time .
This playing surface is clearly dangerous, sufficiently so that the NZRU called off the Maori All Blacks match v Asia Pacific Barbarians that was supposed to have been played at the venue last weekend.
http://uk.reuters.com/article/2014/10/20/rugby-maori-singapore-idUKL3N0SF6KO20141020
It was also heavily criticised after two recent soccer matches were played there; Juventus v Singapore and Brasil v Japan)
do you have alink to that please mate, i'd be interested to read it.
I know the player never got cited, i saw the games, and it's just a really poor challenge but essentially legal - i'm afraid I have a real bug bear about shirt collar tackles having seen my brothers arm broken in several places by one.
So Super Rugby now officially covers Australasia, Africa, Asia and South America...
I feel now may well also be hitting the point of irreversible damage to Super Rugby. It's not that I'm unhappy with expanding - however expanding as they have will undoubtedly turn an already haphazard conference system, into a dog's breakfast. If they organized this in terms of a round robin system where every team just has to suck up a one-off additional trip to Asia/South America then I would be fine - but I'm not convinced that who meets at the end of the conference systems will accurately reflect the best teams in the competition. It's already BS frankly - where New Zealand gets punished for a strong conference - and teams which have earned less points still get a guaranteed top 3 spot - but now I'm not convinced the table will really reflect the quality of the teams at all. That said, I could be wrong as I don't have the Masters Degree in applied mathematics to know where any of the teams will in reality stand in the table..
No I don't unfortunately. There was a short piece in the Sports section of the 6pm TVNZ News on the day it happened. Some players were asked about it and they definitely said that the surface was a major contributing factor. Apparently, the footing was unpredictable; you would be running and you could either slip on the sandy surface or your studs could "catch" unexpectedly on one of the many ridges of grass. They said it sometimes got worse if you tried to sidestep or change direction suddenly. I have looked through the TVNZ sports news archives but haven't been able to find it.
Also the footage of Williams' accident seems to have disappeared off the web. I have found a number of links to it and they are all dead. As I recall it, Williams did stumble just as he was tackled.
I can't watch the incident as it's not nice, mainly because of the outcome, he's trying to saty on his feet and the guy has his shirt he drops his weight and Owens flips over and comes down on his neck.
Does this mean that the each team will play every other or will the same teams play the same teams each year?
Couldn't find the agreed format yet?