• Help Support The Rugby Forum :

South Africa vs British and Irish Lions - Test 2

Think he just about keeps it but tbh not that sure on how the role works
 
Hard to argue as you see those ones given either way. Personally think it wasn't but not a controversial decision. just poor from Lions leading up to that.
 
By the law book it's a clear try. It's never knocked on (ball never leaves hand and then touches ground) and there is downward pressure. Remember there is two ways to score a try: having control of ball and it touching the ground or pressing down on a loose ball.
 
Okay check the post history for

anderton46

Mrs. Peter Quinn

Don't Skip Leg Day


One has been disparagng about the Scots the whole your

I realise that having a pop at Hogg is a sport here, But these are taking the ****. If you want to blame the try on someone it isn't Hogg

Now Price is on there are more Scots to blame
You're the only one who thinks there is a problem here and are clearly not watching the game. I'd recommend you stick to the waters now
 
It's not over yet. Lions have been poor in the second half. It does feel like every small thing is going in SA's favour (I'm talking about the bounce of the ball etc. not refereeing).
 
I think these tests have proven the lions and gatland did not have any extra attack hidden.
I think it was more his choice of bench that showed that. The lack of x factor from the bench is telling. Think he had the likes of Daly/Farrell there to sure up a game already won, not expecting to have to come from behind.
 
By the law book it's a clear try. It's never knocked on (ball never leaves hand and then touches ground) and there is downward pressure. Remember there is two ways to score a try: having control of ball and it touching the ground or pressing down on a loose ball.
You're forgetting ball was in hand then came out, the key is the grounding coming from arm after the ball was hand. Its not like someone kicking then grounding with forearm.
 
Top