I honestly thought Robshaw was excellent today . In my opinion it's more important to knock this lock in the back row experiment on the head and go back to Robshaw at 6 and Underhill at 7 . It was the most natural looking back row we have had for ages !For me Robshaw doesn't have a place in this team. The only justification people seem to have for him is that he's a workhorse. The thing about being a workhorse is that you can actually see whether it's true or not in the stats by how many tackles they've made, and looking at the stats he tends to actually be pretty average, repeatedly outdone by the likes of Itoje, Lawes, Launch, Underhill, Simmonds and even Mako who tends to only play around 50 minutes. Considering all of those other options offer more in attack, the lineout or in Underhills's case is much more physical in defence, I just don't see how his place can be justified. His time has come IMO. Underhill and Simmonds are both better flankers.
What game were you watching?For me Robshaw doesn't have a place in this team. The only justification people seem to have for him is that he's a workhorse. The thing about being a workhorse is that you can actually see whether it's true or not in the stats by how many tackles they've made, and looking at the stats he tends to actually be pretty average, repeatedly outdone by the likes of Itoje, Lawes, Launch, Underhill, Simmonds and even Mako who tends to only play around 50 minutes. Considering all of those other options offer more in attack, the lineout or in Underhills's case is much more physical in defence, I just don't see how his place can be justified. His time has come IMO. Underhill and Simmonds are both better flankers.
For me it's irrelevant that a player has few caps if they're comfortable at international level. Underhill has fully settled in and Hughes started all but 2 of England's games last year. The only one of Underhill, Simmonds and Hughes that hasn't fully settled in is Simmonds. I can live with 1/3.It's the 6N. It matters. It is not the time to experiment with no caps in an entire unit of the pitch. That's what SIs and AIs are for, by which time, the unit is established by the next 6N.
MVuniploa
Hartley
Williams
Lawes
Launchbury
Robshaw
Simmonds (Underhill if injured)
Hughes (if he comes through tomorrow and next weekend unscathed)
Care
Ford
May
Farrell
Joseph
Nowell
Watson
George, Marler, Cole/Sinckler, Itoje, Underhill/Mercer
Vellacott, Te'o, Brown
In July, we can try Underhill and Simmonds together on the flanks, and start introducing Mercer off the bench without needing injuries to get there.
Of course, we also disagree significantly on Robshaw's value to the team.For me it's irrelevant that a player has few caps if they're comfortable at international level. Underhill has fully settled in and Hughes started all but 2 of England's games last year. The only one of Underhill, Simmonds and Hughes that hasn't fully settled in is Simmonds. I can live with 1/3.
What's his value to the team then? Not being confrontational, genuinely curious as to what it is that I'm missing.Of course, we also disagree significantly on Robshaw's value to the team.
If I agree that he has no place there, then I'd be happier to risk not having him there. But the assertion is... really odd
All valid points but we've already got Hartley and Cole in the pack that fall into the kind-of-dead-weight-but-offer-experience/instinct/leadership-etc mould. For me, 3/8 players in the pack is too many for that. Seeing as Hartley's captain and there's no one really sticking their hand up to replace Cole, personally I'd choose Robshaw to replace but I can see why you'd disagree.Workrate, experience, leadership, instinct, reading of the game, cleaning up bad ball, linking carrying.
Basically, he's ahead of Underhill in everything except tackling.
It's like trying to compare Richard Hill to Joe Worsley - except that both are 15% worse than the 2004 versions.
Underhill can improve from here, but he isn't there yet.
For what I anticipated, Wales England, Ireland France and Wales Scotland were major footballing disappointments. Honestly found myself wanting today's game to just end.That was dreary. Similar to Paris last week but Wales couldn't score and they forgot they had to start the game!
Both teams devoid of a ball winner in the loose. I was frankly amazed. The physical contest was average at best, but thought England looked much better with pressure in defence. Not convincing for either side. Hard to pick any side worthy of winning this tournament based on the important matches to date.Thats the point mate, we dominated more of the game than Wales and had little to no points to show for it.
Totally agreed on 6. Underhill/Robshaw should be at 6. A Curry at 7 maybe? Or Simmonds if Hughes goes 8. We were poor at the breakdown, and an extra lock doesn't matter. We gave to many penalties away
We still won. They won't be partying on the streets of Total Network Solutions tonight (old joke, still funny)
Southern Hemisphere TMO called the non try. Is he waiting on his brown envelope outside twickers.When it comes to Twickenham, when one of those teams is wearing white, the rub of the green becomes very apparent...
Some of the kiwi-called matches I've seen I wouldn't be surprised... but it goes beyond just the blatantly wrong TMO decision.Southern Hemisphere TMO called the non try. Is he waiting on his brown envelope outside twickers.