Mallet should have led the indaba and not venter. Venter an AC is "groot tjomies" as he said on supersport the other day.
I don't understand how Brendan Venter is all of a sudden a coaching expert.
I don't understand how Brendan Venter is all of a sudden a coaching expert.
Venter is a very good coach. Probably one of the best from South Africa. But its his ability to create a professional environment that is beneficial to the players and the team that he is renowned for.
He is a guy who will know what structures to put in place to be succesfull and he has extensive knowledge of the structures of rugby clubs in other countries.
Venter is a very good coach. Probably one of the best from South Africa. But its his ability to create a professional environment that is beneficial to the players and the team that he is renowned for.
He is a guy who will know what structures to put in place to be succesfull and he has extensive knowledge of the structures of rugby clubs in other countries.
Just read on Sport 24 that Heyneke was not invited to the indaba. Also Nick Mallet and Andre Markgraaff declined the invitations.
Link: http://www.sport24.co.za/Rugby/RugbyChampionship/heyneke-not-invited-to-coaching-indaba-20161014
Just read on Sport 24 that Heyneke was not invited to the indaba. Also Nick Mallet and Andre Markgraaff declined the invitations.
Link: http://www.sport24.co.za/Rugby/RugbyChampionship/heyneke-not-invited-to-coaching-indaba-20161014
If Malett & Markgraaff say there's no point in holding a coaching Indaba and that coaching is at the bottom of the list of things that need attention then I would suggest they too have failed the Bok faithful - for goodness sake put your selfish pride to one side and act in the best interests of SA Rugby - whether you agree with it or not. There is nothing to be gained by not participating in the Indaba.
I wouldn't disagree that there are fundamental flaws in the structure and they need to be addressed with a different approach but the 1000 mile journey starts with the first step - if the offer of co-operation is extended then give it a chance - don't just shoot the opportunity to make a difference down without at least an effort.
If this is their final position on the matter then I believe they should refrain from expressing any further opinion on the state of SA Rugby in the media. They had their chance to make a difference however small and they chose to squander it.
Only reason why i think Mallett declined, is he found out that political interference will stay, and he then decided he won't waste his time.
I think there's more to it that what that article says with regard to Mallett and Markgraaff not attending.
Why is that article only on Sport24. Why hasn't any other noteworthy sports news site also indicated that these guys are not attending??
Maybe they were told not to come. Perhaps Mallett's negativity the last 3 years, has made others feel that they don't want his pessimism at this indaba which is suppose to create optimism.
Negativity or realism ?
So, D-day for SA Rugby and Springbok rugby starts today.