A
ak47
Guest
actually dudeOriginally posted by umosay+Jan 18 2005, 12:31 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (umosay @ Jan 18 2005, 12:31 PM)</div><!--QuoteBegin-ak47Yeah but did the game look like them? yes@Jan 18 2005, 01:26 PM
those pics from the HB site banner are from a movie, or intro sequence
the gameplay graphics will NOT look like that
All pics that were on HB's site as banners for cricket2004 and rugby2004 werent gameplay pics
If you want i'll show you a hi-res in-game FIFA 2005 pic, that is what they will look like. [/b]
post up a few pics from FIFA2004
if they are using the same engine the visuals, SHOULD, be nearly identical
i look at FIFA2004 the other day at EB......just to get a glimpse of what R2k5 may look like.
If they can make R2K5 play anything near like and look like a shitty soccer game - its a big step for rugby games, even tho the soccer game is crap, it just emphasises how little attention rugby has gotton in the past.
Even so, this Rugby101 is the most promising thing towards this project
This to me, means they are satisfied with core aspects and have had room, or budget for Rugby101.
However if they have taken the same approach as 2004, and want depth over gameplay, then i'll be spewing
Even tho this is HB, what input into the game does EACanada have
They have made, NBAlive and FIFA, but whom was the developer (HB aquivilent), of NBAlive and FIFA.
NBAlive isnt too bad, but its a pidgeons compared to ESPN's baskeball addition.
If EACanada have had alot of input, this will sound promising....unless of course they also did Rugby2004............whom published Rugby 2004.....i cant remember..........i just have nightmares about HB, and have given EA the benefit of the doubt. (But not anymore after Sanzars quality post, EA can burn and die, after they make TW2006 for me).