Pichot on consistency and the Frank's incident.

[smartcooky]

Even if (it) was wrong? Even if they realise that they were too harsh?

Do you really believe that they should continue to compound the error for the sake of appearing consistent?

This is so intellectually dishonest it's embarrassing to read.

"Intellectual dishonesty is the advocacy of a position known to be false."

I was not advocating that position, I was asking ragerancher if he advocated that position.

However, if you are thinking that the false advocacy applied to my suggestion that rangrancher would hold that view, then as it turns out he actually does...

"To a degree, yes."

... so the position I advocated wasn't false after all.

Also, he made that statement before you posted your pathetic little barb... so please try to keep up!