- Joined
- May 25, 2007
- Messages
- 5,708
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
OK, so hypocrisy and trolling it is. Won't bother engaging.
...tells me you know you are wrong, and you have no answers.
Fine by me if you wish to remain in the dark...
...see my signature
- - - Updated - - -
His answers have consisted of throwing exact defitions and the rulebook around when this argument goes beyond strict following of what the law does or doesn't say and is looking at the disparity in the treatment of players for similar offenses. Whether Franks incident is red cardable or not isn't the primary issue, the issue is he was certainly more reckless with regards to having his fingers all over the Aussie's eye area than Francis or Ashton and yet got nothing. Even then it wouldn't have been an issue if Francis and Ashton had just received small penalties, it's the fact they received huge penalties for something Smartcooky is arguing isn't even a red card offense. I know he has stated that he doesn't think Ashton or Francis should have been cited but then it's a case of, if he can use the opinion of the citing officials this time as support, why can't we use their opinions from previous occassions and the precedent that has been set as support? Cooky is completely ignoring the fact that it's not just our opinion he is arguing with, it's the opinion of the referees and citing officials from previous incidents as well and those officials have deemed that any silly business in the eye area is a serious offense worthy of a ban. You cannot try to claim you are supported by authority figures and then dismiss it when those same authority figures came up with a completely different conclusion.
The only thing there is going to be any agreement on is that the rules need to be much clearer about what constitutes an offense and the punishment. Then of course we get into the whole taking the player in the air problem but that's another issue.
Just answer a couple of questions for me. Yes or No answers only please,
1. Do you think Ashton should have been sent off for what he did?
2. Do you think Francis should have been sent off for what he did?
3. Do you think the suspensions they received were fair and equitable?
Last edited: